[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Conference Call Minutes: August 16, 2006




August 16, 2006

 

Great Lakes Regional Toxic Air Emissions Inventory

Steering Committee Conference Call Minutes

 

Participants

Illinois: Buzz Asselmeier

Indiana: Jon Bates

Michigan: Dennis McGeen, Jim Lax and Allan Ostrander

Minnesota: Dan Steber and Chun Yi Wu

New York: Carlos Mancilla

Ohio

Ontario: Cong Doan

Pennsylvania:

Wisconsin: Orlando Cabrera-Rivera

GLC: Jon Dettling

EPA:

Other:

 

Benzo(a)pyrene report

 

Jon has sent a few versions of an initial report and has highlighted some issues in need of being addressed.

 

One of these is woodstoves and fireplaces. It was noted that New York's emissions for this source category are about 10x higher than for most other states. Carlos said that he has double checked his emission factors and he is using the ones from FIRE, .004 and .005. It was noted that the difference might be in the activity factor. The guidance for this source that the group put together a few years ago notes that the DOE estimate of wood consumption for New York is abnormally high. Carlos will investigate this.

 

Orlando previously proposed factor a factor of 0.019 for fireplaces without inserts based on a literature reference. Orlando will forward a newer emission factor that MARAMA is using in their recent assessment.

 

Jon noted that it is difficult to determine from some states' reporting for this source whether both woodstoves and fireplaces are estimated. For example, Indiana and Ohio have reported only under a single SCC 2104008000, which is generic for both woodstoves and fireplaces. Others, such as Wisconsin have reported under only Woodstove SCCs. Orlando noted that although he's only used the woodstove SCCs, his estimates are intended to include both woodstoves and fireplaces with inserts and hasn't differentiated them because the same set of emission factors are used.

 

Carlos raised the issue of emission factors for human cremation. He's been unable to find an emission factor for this source type. It was noted that there is an emission factor in FIRE for another cremation SCC, which is for point sources. However, this can also be used for the area source cremation SCC. The group discussed this and agreed that the factor was appropriate for human cremation and that the states should apply it. Because the methodology assumes a certain amount of wood is burned with each body, the factor may not be appropriate for animal cremation. Chun Yi noted that 31502101 is the SCC with a cremation emission factor in FIRE database for b(a)p.

 

The next largest category is FCCUs. Jon received a copy of a letter from Buzz which described some source testing that showed that emissions from an FCCU were much lower than previously estimated. WebFIRE has two factors: one is controlled and one is uncontrolled. The lower factor mentioned in the letter is similar in magnitude to the controlled factor. States with FCCU emissions should check with their sources to see if the controlled factor is being used and if not, whether it should be. Chun Yi noted that the MACT standard requires an oxygenation-type of control to be used on these sources.

 

Jon Bates looked into the POM L&E document because he couldn't find the emission factor in FIRE. The factor there may be more up to date than others. This document is from 1998. The document is on the EPA TTN website. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/le/

 

Another category worth examining is open burning. There are three main categories here: household waste (yard and municipal), prescribed burning and forest fires. Dennis asked what the source of the activity data for Household waste burning is. Orlando's  pointed out that Wisconsin's activity data for the  estimates were obtained from their state's solid waste division. Chun Yi mentioned that she's gotten NEI data for these source types from Anne Pope. Chun Yi believes this is updated information for 2002,  not that which is grown from earlier years.

 

Allan noted that RPOdata.org has wildfire and prescribed burning activities for many states.

 

Jon noted that Minnesota did not include any b(a)p for any on-road mobile sources. Both Minnesota as well as many other states all obtained this data through NEI. Chun Yi looked into this issue and identified that the NEI documentation lists a factor for "benzo(a)pyrene", but the CAS that is given to it is that for benzo(e)pyrene. She will check with EPA to see which this should be for.

 

Jon noted that there were also some issues with Non-road sources, commercial marine vessels and railroads. Tom has corrected his non-road numbers, which were unusually high and Orlando has uploaded the corrections. Wisconsin and New York are missing emissions from Commercial Marine Vessels and New York is missing emissions from Railroads. 

 

Orlando had made a comment that it would be beneficial to include some regulatory information in the report, such as reporting thresholds for b(a)p. Jon had suggested the possibility of also looking at the presence of control programs for the major emitting categories. Chun Yi expressed some concern that this may be a lot of work. The group generally agreed that b(a)p reporting thresholds should not be difficult to identify and that the group can include this information at a minimum. Jon will talk to contacts at the EPA regarding whether more detailed information would be useful.

 

State updates

 

IL- b(a)p corrections have been uploaded to the repository

IN -

MI - No additional updates, will be attending Sept. meeting

MN - Still working on 2002 revisions based on NEI data. Anne Pope had MDI emissions from a trade association. Chun Yi will be looking into this and will pass on any information she obtains.

NY - The inventory was created in AFS. Carlos is working on updating this with revised information for benzo(a)pyrene. Both Carlos and Ron are approved to attend the meeting

OH -

PA -

WI - Will be looking at commercial marine vessels and human cremation

 

In person meeting

 

Cong and Peter have arranged for Ed Piche, the division director at MOE to come talk to the group for 30 minutes at the start of the meeting and for an hour-long tour of the MOE facility  during the afternoon of the first day. MOE will also be providing lunch on Wednesday.

 

A new agenda will be compiled and sent out.

 

Proposed material codes for PCB congeners

 

Chun Yi sent a set of proposed material codes to add material codes to the RAPIDS set for PCB congeners at the chlorination level. Orlando has sent this information to his toxicology staff to see what their opinion is regarding this issue. Anne Pope has said that if we add these, NEI will likely add them to their list as well. Orlando mentioned that the regional inventory has been criticized for its lack of PCB emissions data and this may be a method for improving our PCB emission estimates.

 

RAPIDS Questionnaire

 

Jon described the general feedback from the questionnaires and Mark's progress is assessing these. One of the important decisions points that will need to be addressed in the near future is a general choice of a database structure. The options appear to be either something fairly similar to the current RAPIDS, or something based on NEI, but with additions and modifications to accommodate the group's needs. Jon noted that unless modifications to the current RAPIDS software are needed to compile the 2005 inventory, it is likely that no additional programming will be done on the powerbuilder platform, except anything that is needed to migrate that language to the new Java platform. As some first steps, Mark envisions building a starter database and beginning to develop some import/export tools, as well as some data table management tools and basic emission calculation tools.

 

Buzz would like to see things written down and more thoroughly discussed before decisions are made. Several others agreed. Jon noted that design documents will need to be produced and reviewed before programming moves forward.

 

Orlando noted that their state is converting  its EI system from a Powerbuilder  platform to  Dot Net.

 

Allan inquired whether it would be possible to have the capability to import NEI data directly into the repository/CAROL. The NEI RAPIDS conversion was a major pain for them last time and wouldn't be necessary if the RAPIDS format wasn't needed to import to the repository.