[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: Draft Minutes - Jan. 10th, 2006



Jon,

The NEI pollutant code table uses the CAS number when available for
HAPs.  For HAPs that do not have a CAS number, the NEI uses a three
digit code.  CAPs in the NEI pollutant code use abbreviations.

EPA data standards require that the NEI pollutant codes be mapped to
EPA's Substance Registry System (SRS).  The SRS contains CAS numbers
with dashes as well as other data fields.

I have recently updated the NEI  pollutant code table to include
requests from the GLC to add PCB homologues to NEI codes.  This table is
included  in the NEI Look-up table in the point source documentation
section of CHIEF.  I have also recently posted a file that maps NEI
pollutant codes to the SRS.  This file is also posted in the point
source documentation section.

anne


                                                                        
             Jon Dettling                                               
             <dettling@glc.or                                           
             g>                                                      To 
             Sent by:                 airtoxics@great-lakes.net         
             owner-airtoxics@                                        cc 
             great-lakes.net                                            
                                                                Subject 
                                      FW: Draft Minutes - Jan. 10th,    
             01/25/2007 10:48         2006                              
             AM                                                         
                                                                        
                                                                        
              Please respond                                            
                    to                                                  
             dettling@glc.org                                           
                                                                        
                                                                        





      Great Lakes Regional Toxic Air Emissions Inventory
      Steering Committee Conference Call Minutes

      January 10, 2006

      Participants
      Illinois: Buzz Asselmeier
      Indiana:
      Michigan: Dennis McGeen and Allan Ostrander
      Minnesota: Chun Yi Wu
      New York: Carlos Mancilla
      Ohio: Tom Velalis
      Ontario: Cong Doan and Peter Wong
      Pennsylvania: John Hulsberg and Karen Gee
      Wisconsin: Orlando Cabrera-Rivera
      GLC: Jon Dettling
      EPA:
      Other: Mark Young

      Programming language
      Mark has been reorganizing some of the data elements in the prior
      version of the design. He's been paying particular attention to
      computation issues and is working on finding an ideal location for
      some of the elements that are not in NIF, but are needed for
      computation. He's also looked into the issue of defining time
      periods as entities rather than using just start and end dates.
      Mark will show this during the Chicago meeting and would like to
      get feedback as to whether people think the approach will work.
      Mark has also begun looking at the prior set of reference tables
      from RAPIDS 2.X for inclusion in the new data model.

      Orlando asked whether is would make sense to have some data, such
      as for particularly complex sources, to see how they would be
      represented in the current data model. Mark has been using some of
      the RAPIDS test data, but this is somewhat old and may not be
      ideal. If people have other data that might be useful for purposes
      of mapping how it fits into the framework.

      Tom asked whether the NEI reference tables would be a sensible
      starting point. Mark stated that these will be used in addition to
      the current RAPIDS reference tables. A combination of these will
      likely be used, depending on the particular type of data and how
      it is handled in the new data model. In some cases a combined
      table might be made to assist in conversions. For example, the
      pollutant code table could contain the original RAPIDS code, the
      NEI code, the CAS number and other information that might be used
      elsewhere.

      The group may need to make a decision whether they would like to
      begin using the NEI numeric pollutant codes as a primary key or
      whether they would like to keep the RAPIDS codes, with the
      capability of mapping to the NEI codes.

      Mark also suggested that there are other types of data elements,
      such as control efficiencies and rule effectiveness that it would
      be helpful if he had some "real world" data to use to examine the
      mappings and relationships of these data types.

      Carlos suggested that the CAS codes could be used for the
      pollutant codes. John Hulsberg added that the EPA has developed a
      "decimal CAS" system or something similar where some issues around
      the potential for duplication due to the hyphens are resolved.
      PDEP uses this system in many of their databases. Orlando pointed
      out that one issue with using CAS is that there are some cases
      where CAS numbers don't exist for pollutants or groups. This would
      need to be addressed. Mark pointed out that the NEI codes are a
      hodge-podge of different things; some are CAS numbers (minus the
      hyphens), some are based on something entirely different.

      Tom said that the OEPA has just adopted the NEI table as it is for
      reasons of not having to maintain the table themselves, but just
      adopting EPA updates when they are available.

      Orlando suggested adding a field to the RAPIDS' Material Table for
      the NEI numeric pollutant code. This field is already included in
      the Rap_Conversions Table.

      Cong asked whether the Web-FIRE database should be incorporated
      directly in some way. It may be worth including this information
      directly. The group will also likely need to do periodic updates
      of its own to that data. Tom noted that OEPA is developing an
      approach to include Web-FIRE. He can distribute to the group any
      documentation they have on this. This will probably include some
      kind of a reviewed update, where the system detects new records
      and asks the user if they want to make the additions and
      replacements.

      Design issues to discuss at Chicago meeting
      In Chicago, Mark is intending to show the data model as it stands.
      Mark would also like to discuss data storage issues and determine
      the most efficient way to handle certain types of information,
      particularly the items that are currently handled in the
      activities table. Orlando asked Mark to prepare and send in
      advance a list of items he plans to address. Mark will do so. Jon
      noted that Pete has been working on the issue of integrating the
      database design with PostGIS standards for handling of geographic
      information and can present this to the group. Jon will check on
      the room location and will send it to the group.

      RAPIDS Programming Language
      Following the last call, Jon and Pete compiled a listing of what
      they saw as the advantages and disadvantages of both Java and .Net
      as a language for the RAPIDS application. This was sent to the
      group in December. They made an effort to include reference to the
      issues and concerns that others have raised over this issue.
      Following this, Chun Yi has sent some email correspondence from
      within their agency discussing the implications of the language
      choice on their companion software, MIRROR. After examining the
      issue, it appears that the only case in which use of Java would
      present a constraint on the MPCA (who's IT personnel program in
      .Net exclusively) would be if MPCA desired to make direct
      modifications to the RAPIDS code. Programming stand-alone
      companion software (such as MIRROR) in another language will not
      be a problem. Other states were asked whether that had other
      outstanding issues or concerns and what there preference was for
      the programming language.

      IL:   No preference
      MI:No preference
      MN:No preference
      NY:No preference
      OH:No preference
      ON: prefer Java
      PA: prefer Java
      WI: No preference
      GLC: prefer Java

      Based on this, it was agreed that Java would be chosen as the
      language to use.

      Server Issue
      Jon summarized the progress in recovering the server that crashed
      over Thanksgiving weekend. It had been sent to an outside
      contractor who specializes in Sun servers. The contractor returned
      the server saying they had gotten the error fixed. However, the
      GLC was able to access only 2 of 6 partitions when the server was
      re-mounted. The contractor has been contacted again to reexamine
      the problem and restore full functionality. GLC is waiting for
      their response.

      Chun Yi expressed a concern over the date of the last backup and
      would like to see a system in place for more frequent backing-up
      of the repository databases. Jon concurred that this was needed
      and committed to addressing it in the near future.

      Benzo(a)pyrene

      Jon will send a revised version of the b(a)p report by next week
      so that the group has adequate time to review it prior to the
      meeting. He has been working with Jon Bates to update the
      information of Coke Oven Gasses and has been including some other
      changes the group discussed previously and/or that have been sent
      by email. At the meeting, he would like to devote 30-60 minutes to
      discuss developing a "qualitative" assessment of a 10-15 year
      trend in b(a)p emissions for the region by examining what we know
      about certain source categories. Other comments on the report can
      also be discussed in Chicago, with the intention of having a
      finalized version sometime in February. A final dataset will also
      be compiled for release with the report and a downloadable file.

      Chun Yi, Jon and Orlando have prepared and submitted abstracts
      regarding the b(a)p reassessment for both the June AWMA Annual
      conference and the May EPA Emissions Inventory conference. For
      each, a shortened version of the b(a)p report will be prepared and
      submitted for the conference proceedings.




* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
airtoxics is hosted by the Great Lakes Information Network:
http://www.great-lakes.net
To unsubscribe from this list: send mail to majordomo@great-lakes.net
with the command 'unsubscribe airtoxics' in the body of your message. No
quotes or subject line are required.
About : http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/airtoxics/airtoxics.info
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *