|
Cong, If this report
was just released in October, that would explain why the group had not yet had
a chance to take account of this new emission factor. Most of the data
compilation was completed before that. If you feel the quality of this factor
is better than the previous one, you are welcome to update your numbers. If you
can get the changes to me within the next few days, there would be time to
incorporate those changes in the report without needing to delay the report
release. For the report, all I need is a summary of the changes by SCC for your
entire province. Eventually (when the server is back up), we would need to
update the repository so that it is consistent. For that you would need the
usual import files. The other states
reporting wildfire emissions for the b(a)p report were Thanks, Jon ______________________ From: Cong Doan
[mailto:doanco@rogers.com] Jon, There are some changes in estimation of
Benzo(a)pyrene emission from forest wildfires. The estimates for Benzo(a)pyrene from forest wildfire
in NEI 2002 version 2 (released in October 2006?) is much lower than the
estimates from GLC Emissions Assessment of Benzo(a)pyrene in the Great Lakes
Region report. I do not know exactly which emission factor was used in EPA
report. However, I found other document from USEPA website which had emission
factor for BaP which is 1.3E-4 kg/Mg (2.6E-4 lb/ton). This emission factor is
about 6 times smaller than the one Ontario BaP emission from wildfires would drop to 656
lb from 3,736 lb. Please look into that. Thanks. Here are the links: ftp://ftp.epa.gov/EmisInventory/2002finalnei/documentation/version2/nei2002_v1_v2_st_sector_sums.zip Cong, |