|
Tom, I think it is certainly wiser to update to project table to include
the additional SCCs than to revise the practice at your, or other, agencies. We
will certainly see that these additional SCCs are included in the reference SCC
table that is included when the new RAPIDS is released, provided you continue
to remind us of this when we get to that point. The question will be whether to
make a systematic effort to provide an update to the reference table for SCCs
that is in the last version of RAPIDS (2.4.1). We can discuss on the next call (Wednesday)what
the easiest way to approach this is. Jon ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jon Dettling 734-274-5183 dettling@glc.org From: Tom Velalis
[mailto:tom.velalis@epa.state.oh.us] To All I uploaded the State
files in the stand alone RAPIDs file and a number of records are being
rejected. The dominant reason
for the rejected records is due to RAPIDs outdated SCC table. For example, the
following SCC were used in the generation of the State inventories but are missing in RAPIDs 2285002010
Rail 2280002020 Marine 2280002040 Marine 2275020000 Aircraft 2275050000 Aircraft There may be more
incompatible SCCs between NMIM and RAPIDs or even Mobile 6 and RAPIDs. Instead
of revising the State inventory SCCs to conform with existing RAPIDs
codes, I suggest bringing the RAPIDS
SCC table up to date. Are we in agreement
with that approach? Tom. |