[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: BEACHNET==> Thank you for all of your hard work



Dear Mark,
 
Thank you very much for your posting.  I was also dismayed when the local news discussed the report.  They described Los Angeles beaches as being among the worst in the country and said this is due to "...high levels of fecal matter..." being detected in the water.  I agree with your message and especially agree that unnecessarily frightening the public is not the best way to ensure our beaches are safe for swimming.
 
Sincerely,
 
Terri
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
Theresa R. Slifko, Ph.D.
Associate Environmental Scientist
Los Angeles County Sanitation District
1955 Workman Mill Road
Whittier, CA 90601
Tel: 562-908-4288 x2805
Fax: 562-908-4293
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-beachnet@great-lakes.net [mailto:owner-beachnet@great-lakes.net]On Behalf Of Pfister, Mark A.
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:50 PM
To: Stoner, Nancy; Jill Lis; beachnet@great-lakes.net
Subject: RE: BEACHNET==> Thank you for all of your hard work

Dear Nancy:

 

I agree with Jill and I am very disappointed with NRDC’s very heavy reliance on E. coli data (a questionable fecal indicator bacterium) to push what appears to be an agenda that our Great Lakes are not suitable to swim in.

 

http://www.chicagopublicradio.org/Content.aspx?audioID=26920

 

Cases in point, please listen to the audio (link above) from the head of your NRDC Midwest Program, Mr. Henry Henderson, on Chicago NPR yesterday where he states “I wouldn’t swim in the lake (laughing). I wouldn’t.”  This comment and others in your report certainly do not give me the impression that your organization is truly interested in moving forward and addressing the complex issues that surround the fecal indicator bacteria paradigm that drives these beach issues that you have reported on.

 

Additionally, from a recreational waterborne illness point of view, the CDC has reported in their most recent “Surveillance for waterborne disease and outbreaks associated with recreational water – United States, 2003-2004” http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5512a1.htm that:

“During 2003--2004, treated water venues were associated with 43 (69.4%) of the recreational water outbreaks and 2,446 (90.7%) of the cases (Tables 2 and 3; Figure 3). Untreated venues were responsible for 19 (30.6%) of the WBDOs but only 252 (9.3%) of the cases (Tables 4 and 5). Similar proportions were identified by venue treatment type when gastroenteritis outbreaks were analyzed separately (Table 6).”

While I agree with you that we should continue to reduce both point and non-point source pollution to our surface waters, frightening the public unnecessarily is not the method that I would suggest to reach the intended outcome.

 

Sincerely,

 

Mark A. Pfister, MS, LEHP

Associate Director

Environmental Health Services

Lake County Health Department and CHC

3010 Grand Avenue

Waukegan IL 60085

847.377.8028 Phone

847.249.4972 Fax

mpfister@co.lake.il.us


From: owner-beachnet@great-lakes.net [mailto:owner-beachnet@great-lakes.net] On Behalf Of Stoner, Nancy
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 8:34 AM
To: Jill Lis; beachnet@great-lakes.net
Subject: RE: BEACHNET==> Thank you for all of your hard work

 

Jill,

 

NRDC did surveys of all coastal states this year and included in the report the info they gave us about the positive things they are doing.  Here is the link for the Ohio chapter, http://www.nrdc.org/water/oceans/ttw/sumohi.pdf, which includes educational activities by the Cleveland Dept of Public Health, use of the predictive model Nowcast, Ashtabula and USGS collaboration on predictive modeling, evaluation of rapid testing techniques, plans to monitor for algal blooms, how often beaches are monitored, how advisories are done and how the public is notified. We also did a Great Lakes chapter that included more info region wide on predictive modeling and sanitary surveys. 

 

I see that the Ohio-specific press release says the following: 

 

The report also noted that, while beaches in Illinois, Ohio, and Wisconsin ranked highest for percent of samples exceeding national health standards, which clearly indicates a problem, Illinois and Ohio monitor their beaches much more frequently than most other states and all three states have aggressive policies of immediately issuing swim advisories rather than waiting for re-tests, as many other states do.

To my mind, the bad news in the Great Lakes is about water quality. Until we address the stormwater and sewage pollution that causes beach closures and advisories, we can expect to see a continuing high level over time.   That was the message that I pitched on the Great Lakes.  If you think it is the wrong one, I'd be happy to discuss. 

 

I would also alert everyone on this list serve that the window for passage of the Beach Protection Act this year will soon close if we don't get the bill back to the floor for a vote in the Senate.   Please contact your Senators to ask them to move the bill, S. 2844.  Sen. Voinovich has been a great leader in this effort, and I'm sure that is informed by the good work that you are doing in your program.  Thanks.

 

Nancy Stoner

NRDC

202-289-2394

 


From: owner-beachnet@great-lakes.net [mailto:owner-beachnet@great-lakes.net] On Behalf Of Jill Lis
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 8:58 AM
To: beachnet@great-lakes.net
Subject: BEACHNET==> Thank you for all of your hard work

Hello to everyone in the beach community. It's that time of year where I find myself frustrated by the recent release of the NRDC report, where my state, Ohio, has been ranked as the 2nd in the nation to meet water quality standards.  We have made such progress in Ohio and the Great Lakes and so much more work and research is going on, including 7 day a week sampling and predictive modeling at several beaches, but only the negative is reflected in the report.  All of us work so hard and are so passionate about the work we do on the beach program to make our beaches safer and cleaner.  I just wanted to thank all of you for the work you do every day, the conferences and workshops that are put on, the on-going partnerships and collaborations, and especially this list-serve which has always been an open line of communication.  Thanks to all - Jill Lis