[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
E-M:/ Anne and the Bond Issue
- Subject: E-M:/ Anne and the Bond Issue
- From: "Smethurst" <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 17:13:58 -0600
- List-Name: Enviro-Mich
- Reply-To: "Smethurst" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
While I agree this is a "make-up" deal
prompted by politics, we need to take what we can get. Having said that, I
hope that we could add money for recreation on state forest land. The
recent veto of Forest 2000 recreation legislation that took years to get
too leave the Forest Management Division without the money to operate
campgrounds, hiking and skiing trails, water trails, etc., the way they need to
be managed. Although the veto might have been correct given Rep.
Alley would to give snowmobile registration dollars to a "private"
agency, it still leave the DNR hanging. They need help and we had a plan that
virtually all users groups supported. If a revised version of that doesn't
pass, it would be nice to get a pittance from the bond money.
What's the take of the political experts on why
the veto and it's future?