[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]

E-M:/ Bush/Blair agree terms for Iraq attack



Environmental issues galore here!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,764197,00.html
Title: Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Bush and Blair agree terms for Iraq attack
Guardian Unlimited
Login Go to:  Guardian Unlimited home Politics Books Arts Film Sport Football Jobs EducationGuardian.co.uk MediaGuardian.co.uk SocietyGuardian.co.uk Money Shopping Travel The Observer Search the archive ---------------------- News Audio Net news Special reports The Guardian UK latest The weblog The informer The Northerner The wrap World latest Business latest Arts latest ---------------------- Crossword Headline service Syndication services Events / offers Help / contacts Information Newsroom Soulmates Notes & Queries Style guide Travel offers TV listings Weather Web guides ---------------------- Guardian Weekly Money Observer 
Guardian UnlimitedSpecial reports
Home UK Business Net Picture gallery The wrap Weblog Talk Search
The Guardian World News guide Arts Special reports Columnists Audio Help Quiz

Special report Iraq

  Search this site

Go to...
Special report: Iraq

Iraq archived articles







 In this section
Nick Cohen: The last thing the US wants is democracy in Iraq

Bush and Blair agree terms for Iraq attack

Iraq opposition aims for territorial base

Leader: Parliament and Iraq

No Commons vote likely on Iraq

Making enemies make friends

Drop plans to attack Saddam, Tehran tells US

No Iraq attack without evidence, pledges Blair

Hans von Sponeck: Go on, call Bush's bluff

Bush rallies US for strike on Iraq

Jordan prince touted to succeed Saddam

Owen Bowcott: Homeless and friendless

Iraq's Kurds assess risk of backing the US

Saddam taunts 'evil tyrants' in 4,000-word tirade

Saddam Hussein's speech



UP

Bush and Blair agree terms for Iraq attack

Military hatch new option for invasion

Simon Tisdall and Richard Norton-Taylor
Saturday July 27, 2002
The Guardian


Tony Blair has privately told George Bush that Britain will support an American attack on Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to accept resumed UN weapons inspections.

President Bush's "understanding", based on conversations with the prime minister, is that he can count on Mr Blair, according to well-placed Bush administration officials.

The agreement between the leaders comes as diplomatic, military and intelligence sources revealed details of a new plan for the invasion of Iraq, which could take place sooner than had previously been presumed.

The plan involves a slimmed-down force of around 50,000 troops, which could be deployed within a matter of days.

It had been widely assumed that the US could not deploy sufficient numbers of troops needed for the task before the end of this year at the earliest.

Now senior officials are saying a sudden military strike could be launched as soon as October.

Boeing and other US companies are working round the clock, producing satellite-guided "smart" bombs that would be used in huge air strikes to accompany any ground invasion.

Although no plan of attack has yet been finalised, Mr Blair has already offered "in principle" to lend full British military and diplomatic backing for an assault.

Mr Blair insists in public that no decision has been made about British involvement in any US military attack on Iraq. "We are not at the point of decision yet," he told a Downing Street press conference on Thursday.

A Washington source familiar with administration thinking said that while it was accurate to say Mr Bush had not yet decided how or when to attack Iraq, the president was considering his options in the belief Mr Blair would go along with the US.

Two options have been widely discussed in Washington. One would involve inserting Iraqi defectors, backed by 5,000 US troops and "precision" air strikes. The plan was once dismissed by General Anthony Zinni, America's Middle East envoy, as a recipe for a "Bay of Goats" disaster, comparable to the 1961 Bay of Pigs fiasco in Cuba.

The second option, which would require at least a three-month build-up, is the US military's central command standard war plan, involving 250,000 troops and heavy armour. Britain, it is suggested, would contribute 30,000 troops, an armoured division backed up by air and sea support.

A new third option now being considered is for a sudden strike, involving no more than 50,000 troops who would bypass the Iraqi army and make straight for Baghdad.

With thousands of US troops already deployed in Kuwait and Qatar, such a plan could be executed quickly, officials say.

Though a sudden attack combining air power and ground forces would still involve huge risks, it would have the advantage of avoiding mounting opposition to military action against Iraq in such countries as Saudi Arabia and Jordan - whose bases the US might not need - as well as wrongfooting Saddam Hussein, officials say.

British military sources describe this third option as "high risk" but with a "high payoff" were it to succeed.

The US officials say Mr Bush has also obtained agreement in principle for support from France in conversations with President Jacques Chirac.

Mr Blair is understood to have told Mr Bush that British support is contingent on the completion of a genuine effort to persuade Iraq to readmit weapons inspectors.

Mr Blair has also insisted that Mr Bush offer a "full explanation" in public of his reasons for going to war and that a "major effort" be made to win over sceptical public opinion. "Blair wants him to make the case," a source said.

Part of the Blair-Bush understanding was that evidence that Iraq presented an urgent threat through its alleged attempts to obtain weapons of mass destruction would be published in London.

The source said Britain and the US were jointly opposed to seeking a new UN security council resolution to justify an attack on Iraq. Both countries will adopt the position that action is allowable under existing UN resolutions.

Mr Blair indicated on Thursday that the weapons inspections talks, which Kofi Annan, the UN secretary general, has suspended indefinitely after an unsuccessful Vienna meeting this month, would fail - thus increasing the likelihood of an attack.

Special reports
Iraq
Guardian Unlimited Politics: Britain and Iraq
Israel & the Middle East
George Bush's America

Interactive guides
Iraq under threat - how the US might attack
The Gulf war

Iraq in pictures
Photo gallery: 10 years after the Gulf war

The weblog
Weblog special: America at war

Media, information and portals
20.12.2001: Guardian Unlimited news guide - Iraq
Middle East News Online
Arab Gateway: Iraq briefing
Middle East Daily

Useful links
Iraq sanctions - UN security council
UN special commission on Iraq
Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq




Printable version | Send it to a friend | Read it later | See saved stories





UP

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002