[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]

Re: E-M:/ Public comments on the proposed Consent Order withDow



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enviro-Mich message from "Paul Hanly" <PNARH@bigpond.com>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is anyone putting collated comments on a web site for the benefit of the
rest of the community?

At Rhodes, NSW where we are facing a clean up of land and sediments
contaminated by Union Carbide, we are trying to put the comments on the EIS
on our web site:
http://www.rhodesnsw.org/Meriton/EISIssuesM.htm

I would certainly be interested to see comments on the proposed Dow order
and supporting documents on a single web site.

Kind regards
Paul Hanly

----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Janus" <Janus@nwf.org>
To: <jlanigan115990MI@comcast.net>; <enviro-mich@great-lakes.net>;
<davedem@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 3:10 AM
Subject: Re: E-M:/ Public comments on the proposed Consent Order withDow


> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Enviro-Mich message from "Erik Janus" <Janus@nwf.org>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I strongly echo Dave's sentiment.  I am a formally trained
> and experienced human health risk assessor and even I am
> having difficulties following the contractor's risk
> assessment.  I don't see how "laypeople" like
> the Midland residents could possibly digest and comment
> on all the info involved.  Even the EPA said they could not
> review this is the time period allotted.
>
>
> - Erik Janus
>
> Erik R. Janus
> Great Lakes Natural Resource Center
> National Wildlife Federation
> 213 West Liberty, Suite 200
> Ann Arbor, MI  48104-1322
> phone (734) 769-3351, ext. 44
> fax (734) 769 1449
> janus@nwf.org
>
> >>> "Dave Dempsey" <davedem@hotmail.com> 11/26/02 10:39PM >>>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Enviro-Mich message from "Dave Dempsey" <davedem@hotmail.com>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Everyone closely tracking this issue knows that the illegal elements of
> the
> earlier proposed consent order persist in the new draft. Whether they
> are
> renumbered or on different pages, or slightly reworded, matters not.
> What
> matters is that this is the most blatant giveaway of the public trust
> I've
> witnessed in 20 years of environmental policy work. Citizens must
> fiercely
> oppose it.
>
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================================
> ENVIRO-MICH:  Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
> and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action.   Archives at
> http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/enviro-mich/
>
> Postings to:  enviro-mich@great-lakes.net      For info, send email to
> majordomo@great-lakes.net  with a one-line message body of  "info
enviro-mich"
> ==============================================================



==============================================================
ENVIRO-MICH:  Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action.   Archives at
http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/enviro-mich/

Postings to:  enviro-mich@great-lakes.net      For info, send email to
majordomo@great-lakes.net  with a one-line message body of  "info enviro-mich"
==============================================================