[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]

Re: E-M:/ Recommended: "National Parks fast falling into disrepair"

Enviro-Mich message from Christopher Graham <grahamz@umich.edu>

Hi, Anne --

Thanks for the parks news!

As you know, lack of adequate spending on parks is endemic, not just at the 
Federal level, of course.  Federal Parks are especially behind in capital 

For the first time since at least the early 1950's, the next State budget 
indicates there will be no general fund spending on parks in 
Michigan.  That means any aspect of a park that is not covered by fees paid 
for camping or entry will not be tended, and that's a lot of things not 
getting attention -- including capital things.

It took a multi-million dollar bond issue to bail our State Parks out of 
the pits in the 1960's, for failure to properly keep up with them during 
the previous years.  This funding approach is NOT a cheaper way to 
accomplish the basic services our government should be accomplishing.  Even 
now, improvements are being made from a bond issue raised several years 
ago, NOT from ongoing funds.  Keeping up with things on a planned and 
routine basis is the way to spend the least of our tax dollars!  There is 
not a single excuse for failure to do business in this way.

Our State government clearly has a growing revenue problem.  It began when 
Mr. Engler built so many prisons but would not raise taxes to cover the 
cost of running them.

The problem was amplified when Mr. Engler led in cutting every tax that 
could be cut in times of plenty.

It is now further amplified both by a poor economy and one increasingly 
dominated by service businesses which pay much less tax (and whose 
employees pay less tax) than did our traditional manufacturing businesses 
(and their employees, both of which are declining rapidly).

Now we are left in trouble on the revenue side, and things we are proud of 
about our State and things that are essential to do for our people are made 
to suffer.

Its time for some serious discussion about changing our whole pattern of 
raising revenue!

Seeping Bear has, I think, actually dropped its "National Lakeshore" 
connotation, and is now Sleeping Bear Dunes National Park.  I don't know if 
Pictured Rocks did the same thing -- it certainly is run by NPS and is in 
their budget.  So (I think you know) there are three National Parks in 


At 09:46 AM 5/27/2004, anne.woiwode@sierraclub.org wrote:
>Enviro-Mich message from anne.woiwode@sierraclub.org
>anne.woiwode@sierraclub.org has recommended this article from
>The Christian Science Monitor's electronic edition.
>This article from the Christian Science Monitor highlights a very serious 
>problem facing Michigan's National Parks as well.  I was just fortunate 
>enough to be on Isle Royale last week learning about the $26 million back 
>log of repairs for the facilities of Michigan's only National Park. Even 
>with some success getting special grants to cover some emergencies (like a 
>gasoline carrying barge that was found to be on the verge of failure, so 
>it had to be replaced 10 years early, with the new one to arrive this 
>week, they hope) the Park is far behind in needed upkeep.
>Sign up for the Monitor Treeless Edition!
>Click here to email this story to a friend:
>Click here to read this story online:
>Headline:  National Parks fast falling into disrepair
>Byline:  Brad Knickerbocker Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
>Date: 05/25/2004
>(ASHLAND, ORE.)Leaky lodge roofs. Potholed roads. Beaches closed for lack 
>of a
>lifeguard. Not enough rangers in their Smokey Bear hats teaching kids
>about flora and fauna.
>It's not a picture Americans want to imagine for their national parks -
>the "crown jewels" often likened to European cathedrals.
>But as the nation approaches the year's first holiday weekend when
>families head for the mountains, seashore, and battlefield monuments,
>there's a groundswell of concern (bordering on revolt) among current
>and retired US Park Service employees over the condition of national
>Despite the efforts and rhetoric of Interior Secretary Gale Norton and
>Park Service Director Fran Miainella, the backlog of much-needed park
>maintenance continues to grow, these employees say.
>Insiders have leaked a Park Service memo ordering park superintendents
>to refer to budget-driven program cuts as "service level adjustments."
>Such adjustments, the memo suggests, could include closing visitor
>centers on some holidays, cutting back on ranger talks and tours,
>eliminating lifeguard services at beaches, and closing parks two days a
>week. In a sideshow drama, the chief of the park police in Washington
>has been threatened with dismissal for speaking out about budget needs
>and staffing levels.
>Meanwhile, a coalition of environmental groups has just sued the
>Interior Department over its failure to minimize the air pollution
>impacts of nearby development on more than a dozen national parks and
>wilderness areas in the Rocky Mountain West. Interior is charged with
>failure to uphold the Clean Air Act around parks.
>The National Park Service is a mammoth organization. With some 20,000
>professionals and 125,000 volunteers, it oversees 388 parks, monuments,
>battlefields, historic sites, lakeshores, recreation areas, scenic
>rivers and trails, and the White House. The number of park units has
>nearly doubled since 1970, and annual visits now total nearly 300
>million. All of this costs some $2.3 billion a year.
>But critics say (and administration officials acknowledge) that's not
>enough to keep the resources in good shape while meeting the
>recreational and educational expectations of visitors. According to the
>General Accounting Office, the backlog of deferred maintenance at
>national parks has grown to something between $4 billion and $6.8
>Speaking at Everglades National Park the first summer of his
>presidency, President Bush pledged to "restore and renew America's
>national parks." Since then, however, the administration and Congress
>have budgeted $662 million in new funding for such improvements. That
>sounds like a lot, but spread over four budget cycles (2002-2005) it's
>inadequate to meet the need, say watchdog groups.
>The private National Parks Conservation Association says $600 million
>in additional funds are needed every year to adequately chip away at
>the park maintenance backlog. Among the problems outlined in the
>association's recent report:
>* Hikers cannot reach backcountry cabins at Mount Rainier National Park
>in Washington State because necessary bridges and trails need repair.
>* Large sections of a historic lighthouse and Fort Jefferson at Dry
>Tortugas National Park in South Florida are unsafe.
>* The visitor center at the USS Arizona Memorial in Hawaii is sinking.
>* Yosemite National Park needs more than $40 million for backlogged
>projects, including trail and campground maintenance, sewer system
>replacement, and electrical upgrades.
>* Ancient stone structures are collapsing at Chaco Culture National
>Historical Park in New Mexico.
>* At Yellowstone, 150 miles of roads have not been repaired in years,
>and many of the park's several hundred buildings are in poor condition.
>"Claims that there are now more dollars than ever before, [are] simply
>not true at the park level," says Bill Wade, former superintendent of
>Shenandoah National Park in Virginia and spokesman for the Coalition of
>National Park Service Retirees. "Parks across the system are having to
>significantly cut personnel - including maintenance, law enforcement,
>and interpretive staff as well as resource specialists - because the
>discretionary budget at the park level has diminished over the past
>several years."
>The Park Service retirees group has been joined by active-duty insiders
>- the Association of National Park Rangers and Public Employees for
>Environmental Responsibility - in publicizing in-house memos sent to
>park officials.
>"It is now time to ... determine what actually has to happen to stay
>within the funds you have been allocated," orders one such memo.
>"Please send us a bulleted list of 'service level adjustments' you plan
>to make." Among the suggested cuts: Closing visitor centers on federal
>holidays, eliminating guided ranger tours, and closing parks on Sundays
>and Mondays.
>Part of the problem is, the park service has had other expensive
>obligations to meet: scheduled pay raises for federal employees,
>cleaning up after hurricanes and other natural disasters, and - since
>the terrorist attacks of 911 - providing extra security for places like
>the Statue of Liberty and the Washington Monument when the Department
>of Homeland Security declares a Code Orange alert.
>While noting the size of the task, political appointees running the
>Interior Department and National Park Service tend to emphasize the
>positive. Park Service director Fran Mainella recently told lawmakers
>that the agency has "more funds per employee, per acre, and per visitor
>than at any time in its history." Since the Bush administration took
>over, she said, more than 1,300 repair and rehabilitation projects have
>been funded.
>Meanwhile, the Park Service and the Travel Industry Association of
>America have launched a "See America's National Parks" program to
>encourage Americans to visit their national parks. But in the current
>budgetary climate, say some observers, that may be frustrating.
>"You can't engage in large-scale efforts with the travel industry to
>ramp up visitors and then at the same time pressure superintendents to
>cut service," says Denny Huffman, former superintendent of Dinosaur
>National Monument in Colorado and Utah. "The only possible outcome ...
>is a reduced quality in the visitor's experience."
>(c) Copyright 2004 The Christian Science Monitor.  All rights reserved.
>Click here to email this story to a friend:
>The Christian Science Monitor-- an independent daily newspaper providing 
>context and clarity on national and international news, peoples and 
>cultures, and social trends.  Online at http://www.csmonitor.com
>Click here to order a free sample copy of the print edition of the Monitor:
>                     -- ADVERTISEMENT --
>Sign up for the Monitor News Alert to be notified of special war coverage.
>ENVIRO-MICH:  Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
>and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action.   Archives at
>Postings to:  enviro-mich@great-lakes.net      For info, send email to
>majordomo@great-lakes.net  with a one-line message body of  "info enviro-mich"

Christopher L. Graham, ASLA
(734) 975-7800 (O)
email   grahamz@umich.edu
sms email   7342609890@page.nextel.com  

ENVIRO-MICH:  Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action.   Archives at

Postings to:  enviro-mich@great-lakes.net      For info, send email to
majordomo@great-lakes.net  with a one-line message body of  "info enviro-mich"