[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
Re: E-M:/ RE: / Fw: Compulsory draft for every child
Enviro-Mich message from "Alexander J. Sagady" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
I'm going to call a halt to discussion on this thread.
Please do not circulate responses to spams of the list.
Responding to those privately and taking any necessary
enforcement is my job as list manager, and I've dealt
with the most recent issue privately.
At 01:56 PM 09/24/2004, you wrote:
>It's not a hoax, but it's not a Bush plan to re-open the draft, either. HR
>163 was sponsored by New York City Democrat Charlie Rangel to make a point
>about who's actually being sent to fight the war. He's said he doesn't
>expect it to move, but believes the public would take a very different
>view of the war in Iraq if everyone's sons and daughters were in the pool
>to be sent. Michigan Rep. John Conyers is among those who says the bill
>should at least have a hearing.
>Michigan Public Radio
>(517) 432-3120 ext.380 (desk)
>(517) 303-6264 (cell)
>----- Original Message -----
>To: <mailto:bonnies@CANNONTWP.ORG>Bonnie Shupe ;
>Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 1:40 PM
>Subject: Re: E-M:/ RE: / Fw: Compulsory draft for every child
>I just realized the link I sent had an error message. Please go to
><http://thomas.loc.gov/>http://thomas.loc.gov/ and type in HR 163 in the
>Bill section. You will find the entire congressional bill there. It is
>not a hoax. Pat Hartig
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:bonnies@CANNONTWP.ORG>Bonnie Shupe
>To: <mailto:email@example.com>Hartig ;
>Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 11:34 AM
>Subject: E-M:/ RE: / Fw: Compulsory draft for every child
>Just in case you're not aware of this, this e-mail about reinstating the
>draft is a hoax. It was discussed on our local news channel a few days
>ago. I won't go into whether this is an appropriate post for a Michigan
>environmental list serve.
>Bonnie L. Shupe
>Cannon Township Clerk
>6878 Belding Road NE
>Rockford, MI 49341
>Cell phone: 616-204-0085
>Web site: <http://www.cannontwp.org/>www.cannontwp.org
>[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Hartig
>Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:40 AM
>Subject: E-M:/ Fw: Compulsory draft for every child
>Bush has already placed the huge debt of paying for his war in Iraq on the
>backs of our children. Now he wants to force them to give their lives
>also. Please contact your member of Congress to stop the compulsory draft.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:email@example.com>Kathleen McGovern Studio of Interior
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 9:24 AM
>Subject: Compulsory draft for every child
>Subject: FW: Compulsory draft for every child.
>Mandatory draft for boys and girls (ages 18-26)
>starting June 15, 2005, is something that everyone should know
>about. This literally effects everyone since we all have or know children
>that will have to go if this bill passes.
>There is pending legislation in the house and
>senate (companion bills: S89 and HR 163) which will time the
>program's initiation so the draft can begin as early as spring, 2005,
>just after the 2004 presidential election. The administration is
>quietly trying to get these bills passed now, while the public's
>attention is on the elections, so our action on this is needed
>immediately. Details and links follow.
>This plan, among other things, eliminates higher
>education as a shelter and includes women in the draft. Also,
>crossing into Canada has already been made very difficult.
>Please send this on to all the parents and
>teachers you know, and all the aunts and uncles, grandparents,
>godparents. . . And let your children know - - it's their future,
>and they can be a powerful voice for change!
>This legislation is called HR 163 and can be
>found in detail at this website:
>Just enter in "HR 163" and click search and will
>bring up the bill for you to read. It is less than two pages long.
>If this bill passes, it will include all men and
>ALL WOMEN from ages 18 - 26 in a draft for military action. In
>addition, college will no longer be an option for avoiding the draft
>and they will be signing an agreement with the Canada which will no
>longer permit anyone attempting to dodge the draft to stay within
>it's borders. This bill also includes the extension of military
>service for all those that are currently active. If you go to the
>select service web site and read their 2004 FYI Goals you will see
>that the reasoning for this is to increase the size of the military
>in case of terrorism. This is a critical piece of legislation, this
>will effect our undergraduates, our children and our grandchildren.
>Please take the time to write your congressman and let them know how
>you feel about this legislation.
>Please also write to your representatives and ask
>them why they aren't telling their constituents about these bills and
>write to newspapers and other media outlets to ask them why they're
>not covering this important story.
>The draft $28 million has been added to the 2004
>selective service system budget to prepare for a military draft that
>could start as early as June 15, 2005. Selective service must report
>to Bush on March 31, 2005 that the system, which has lain dormant
>for decades, is ready for activation.
>http://www.sss.gov/perfplan_fy2004.html to view the Selective
>Service System annual performance plan, fiscal year 2004.
>The pentagon has quietly begun a public campaign to
>fill all 10,350 draft board positions and 11,070 appeals board slots
>nationwide. Though this is an unpopular election year topic,
>military experts and influential members of congress are suggesting that if
>Rumsfeld's prediction of a "long, hard slog" in Iraq and Afghanistan
>and permanent state of war on terrorism) proves accurate, the U.S.
>may have no choice but to draft.
>entitled the Universal National service Act of 2003, "to provide for the
>defense by requiring that all young persons (age 18-26) in the United
>States, including women, perform a period of military service or a
>period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense
>and homeland security, and for other purposes." These active bills
>currently sit in the committee on armed services. Dodging the draft
>will be more difficult than those from the Vietnam era. College and
>Canada will not be options. In December, 200 1, Canada and the U.S.
>signed a "smart border declaration," which could be used to keep
>would-be draft dodgers in. Signed by Canada's minister of foreign
>affairs, John Manley, and U.S. Homeland Security director, Tom
>Ridge, the declaration involves a 30 point plan which implements, among
>other things, a "pre-clearance agreement" of people entering and
>departing each country. Reforms aimed at making the draft more
>equitable along gender and class lines also eliminates higher
>education as a shelter. Underclassmen would only be able to postpone
>service until the end of their current semester. Seniors would have
>until the end of the academic year.
>What to do: Tell your friends, Contact your
>legislators and ask them to oppose these bills
>Just type "congress" into the aol search
>engine and input your zip code. A list of your reps will pop up with
>a way to email them directly. We can't just sit and pretend that by
>ignoring it, it will go away. We must voice our concerns and create
>the world we want to live in for our children and grandchildren.
Alex J. Sagady & Associates http://www.sagady.com
Environmental Enforcement, Permit/Technical Review, Public Policy,
Evidence Review and Litigation Investigation on Air, Water and
Waste/Community Environmental and Resource Protection
Prospectus at: http://www.sagady.com/sagady.pdf
PO Box 39, East Lansing, MI 48826-0039
(517) 332-6971; (517) 332-8987 (fax); firstname.lastname@example.org
ENVIRO-MICH: Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action. Archives at
Postings to: email@example.com For info, send email to
firstname.lastname@example.org with a one-line message body of "info enviro-mich"