[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
E-M:/ Finally, an admission -- the war was because OUR oil was under THEIR soil
- Subject: E-M:/ Finally, an admission -- the war was because OUR oil was under THEIR soil
- From: jmgear <jmgear@acd.net>
- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:18:12 -0500
- Delivered-to: enviro-mich-archive@glc.org
- Delivered-to: enviro-mich@great-lakes.net
- List-name: Enviro-Mich
- Reply-to: jmgear <jmgear@acd.net>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enviro-Mich message from jmgear <jmgear@acd.net>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
... and we can't have that, nossir ...
------------
http://mediamatters.org/items/200512010003
Appearing on the November 28 edition of MSNBC's Imus in the Morning,
Newsweek chief political correspondent Howard Fineman declared that the
Bush administration was not "fully candid" about the war in Iraq because
the "honest" argument for going to war seemed too "complicated and
convoluted" for the American people and the world. "[W]hat they did was
underestimate the intelligence of the American people,"
Fineman said, adding that the proper case for war "was that we can't let
this madman ... Saddam Hussein, sit on top of the largest or
second-largest pool of oil in the world and siphon off billions of
dollars to pay protection money, essentially, to the Osama bin Ladens of
the world."
From the November 28 edition of MSNBC's Imus in the Morning:
FINEMAN: Looking back on it, I think there was a case to be made for the
war in Iraq that would have allowed them [the Bush administration] to be
fully --
DON IMUS (host): Honest.
FINEMAN: -- candid and on point with the American people. The problem is
it was too convoluted for their purposes, and I think what they did was
underestimate the intelligence of the American people, and as [Newsweek
managing editor] Jon [Meacham] said, that way lies catastrophe for any
president. And the case was that we can't let this madman who you saw on
TV a little earlier, Saddam Hussein, sit on top of the largest or
second-largest pool of oil in the world and siphon off billions of
dollars to pay protection money, essentially, to the Osama bin Ladens of
the world. That's a complicated and convoluted case that would have been
difficult not only to sell to the American people, but to the United
Nations and the Vatican and every other place where public approval
would have been sought, because it really would have been pre-emptive
war, it really would have been like the Department of Pre-Crime, if you
happen to remember the movie Minority Report, and that would have been
hard to sell. But had we gone in on that basis, which I think is the
honest basis to have gone in, then there would have been more public
support. But we didn't, and instead they reduced it to a cartoon of a
mushroom cloud and a handshake between Saddam and Osama that never
happened, and that's why, having created that cartoon, they're in such
political trouble now.
* A.S.
Posted to the web on Wednesday November 30, 2005 at 7:59 PM EST
==============================================================
ENVIRO-MICH: Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action. Archives at
http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/enviro-mich/
Postings to: enviro-mich@great-lakes.net For info, send email to
majordomo@great-lakes.net with a one-line message body of "info enviro-mich"
==============================================================