[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]

Re: E-M:/ Criticism and replies about the Ann Arbor Greenway proposal

Enviro-Mich message from Eric Sun <esun.mba2001@ivey.ca>

Thanks for explicitly talking about Sierra's position,

Significant Greenspace creates untold value across
space and time in an urban setting.

Frederick Law Olmsted, the creator of Central Park in
NYC (Initially called the "Greensward") and countless
other parks, brought nature to the masses of urbanites
that could not afford an expensive trip to the

Olmsted also created, I might hasten to add, ECONOMIC
VALUE.  That value, however, is not as concentrated in
time and space; i.e. while a condo on Central Park is
very expensive, the initial builders did not reap all
the profits.  Nor has one entity cornered the market
for all the users in Central park, but have created
diverse employment and entrepreneurial opportunities
on a year round and seasonal basis.

If you have ever seen business men and women enjoying
themselves in Hyde Park in London over lunch on a week
day, the attraction of greenspace for talent is

I found National Geographic's March 2005 distillation
of the wonderful effects of park planning an eye

Eric Sun

--- Doug Cowherd <dcow2@yahoo.com> wrote:

>       Roger Kuhlman <rokuhlman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>       Neutral, unbiased experts need to give us the
> facts
> about development in downtown Ann Arbor not
> proponents
> of building the greenway and opponents of
> medium-rise
> housing in Ann Arbor.
>   __________________________
>   Roger, you appear to misunderstand the position of
> the Sierra Club's Huron Valley Group.  We neither
> oppose medium-rise buildings nor housing. 
>   The Sierra Club web site has an interesting page
> that shows how human-scale development can improve
> urban areas.  Click on the photos of these
> real-world street scenes and you will see several
> stages of how they can be improved while being
> densely developed.  Here's the link: 
>   We are an active proponent of policies that will
> increase the number of people living in downtown Ann
> Arbor.  We believe human-scale developments that
> don't damage the historic areas and most attractive
> pedestrian areas, and don't put buildings in the
> floodway and floodplain, are the way to achieve
> this.
>   Fortunately, there are over 100 under-utilized
> parcels that meet these criteria in the downtown Ann
> Arbor area, and more elsewhere, that will almost
> certainly be re-developed with much higher density
> in coming years.
>   The real open question is whether new development
> has to occupy every possible parcel, or whether
> three parcels that are already owned by the public
> and are located in the floodway and floodplain can
> be used as keystone Greenway parks.  These would be
> the only parks with greenspace in the downtown area,
> which is now devoid of them.  One of the many
> benefits of a real Greenway (not the token one
> supported by City Hall) is that it would attract
> more people to live downtown.  Without this
> improvement to the quality of life downtown, it will
> be difficult to attract more residents.
>   Consider the alternative of maximum development
> and no real Greenway that's supported by Ann Arbor's
> mayor and City Council.  The developers and their
> political cronies want both huge public subsidies
> for high-rise buildings and to build in the floodway
> and floodplain. If they get what they want, we'll
> end up with a massive increase in office space (not
> housing) that will suck offices (and their
> employees) from the area around Detroit.  This will
> speed the "hollowing out" of Detroit and the inner
> ring.  And it it will create demand for more
> McMansions in rural Washtenaw County.
>   This maximum development alternative will cause
> sprawl, not stop it.  It will also eliminate the
> chance of using Greenway space to reduce flooding
> and to filter polluted stormwater that's currently
> rushing directly into the Huron River.  It will
> eliminate the chance for a full-scale Greenway that
> will allow people to safely bike and walk instead of
> drive to schools, work, and downtown.  The radical
> maximum development plan will cause more sprawl,
> more cars, more pollution.
>   The Sierra Club supports the more practical
> alternative of a real Greenway, and human-scale
> development that stays out of the floodway and
> floodplain, and doesn't damage historic and
> pedestrian areas.  We believe this will curb sprawl,
> reduce the use of cars, and reduce pollution.
>   There's one other thing to consider.  Those of us
> who sincerely respect and appreciate the natural
> world are often frustrated that so many others don't
> share this feeling.  One benefit of an urban
> Greenway is that if you want people to learn to love
> nature, it might be a good idea to bring some of it
> closer to them, rather than simply to provide
> lectures on this point. Among it's many benefits,
> the Ann Arbor Greenway may be the best way to garner
> public support for future rural land preservation
> efforts.  
>   Doug Cowherd
>   Chair, Sierra Club-Huron Valley Group
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
>  With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo!

ENVIRO-MICH:  Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action.   Archives at

Postings to:  enviro-mich@great-lakes.net      For info, send email to
majordomo@great-lakes.net  with a one-line message body of  "info enviro-mich"