NEPA functions primarily to give the public and the government a
systematic look at the environmental impacts of a project.
I believe it should be changed to require a project's developer to list
the steps he/she will take to achieve a "sustainable" project --- an
"environmentally good" project rather than just a "less bad project".
"Sustainable" means a number of different things to people.
I subscribe to the ideas put forth by Bill McDonough and Michael
Braungart that define a project's sustainability through its adherence
to Nature's three laws of operation.
Live on current solar income.
Waste equals food.
This last law means that a project produces "zero" waste -- all
processes are designed to be closed loop with the material either
returning safely to the soil as basic elements OR are totally
recaptured and recycled. A project that was built around adherence to
these three laws would require NO permits and NO regulation because
it's impact on the environment would be next to zero. NEPA should
encourage this kind of development.
Bill McDonough says, "When you are going 100 miles an hour in the wrong
direction, it doesn't really help to slow down to 30. You are still
going in the wrong direction. We have to turn around and go in the
On Feb 2, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Melissa Fava wrote:
> I am not in disagreement about the need for NEPA.ï¿½ However, after
> reading the official draft recommendations, there are only two actual
> propsals affecting public involvement, one which limits the length of
> EIS reports to under 300 pages and the other mandates that local
> interests will be given more weight than outside groups.ï¿½ The 20 other
> recommendations include timelines for action, further coordination
> with the CEQ, and citizen suit provisions.
> The proposal is not perfect (NEPA, as it stands now, isn't either),
> but it does not "drastically limit the publicï¿½s ability to comment on
> proposed projects" as the Wilderness Society states.ï¿½ I wonder if
> people see "Republican" and "environment" in the same sentence and
> assume the worst without checking out all the facts for themselves.
> Often proposals are written, rejected, and rewritten even worse than
> the first time and I fear a political backlash (one that is probably
> already ha ppening) that would further weaken the law.ï¿½
> You can read the "Initial Findings and Draft Recommendations" at:
> -Melissa Fava
> Roger Kuhlman
>> Enviro-Mich message from Roger Kuhlman
>> NEPA the National Environmental Policy Act is a key
>> environmental law that requires the federal government
>> to review the public health and environmental impacts
>> of all federal projects. It is the foundation upon
>> which all other federal environmental laws are based.
>> A serious effort is being led by Rep Richard Pombo of
>> California to weaken the act.
>> You can read about this effort and take action to help
>> prevent it by going to:
>> Roger Kuhlman
>> Ann Arbor, Michigan
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> ENVIRO-MICH: Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
>> and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action. Archives at
>> Postings to: email@example.com For info, send email to
>> firstname.lastname@example.org with a one-line message body of "info
> Bring words and photos together (easily) with
> PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.
Christopher B. Bedford
Sweetwater Local Foods Market
#6543 Hancock Road
Montague, MI 49437
The Sweetwater Local Foods Market is Michigan's FIRST Farmers Market to
exclusively sell humanely raised animal products and
chemical-free/Certified Organic fruits and vegetables.
SATURDAYS 8am-1pm in the parking lot of Russ' Restaurant at the
intersection of Route 31 and M120 (Holton Road) in Muskegon.