[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
E-M:/ Fwd: [NativeNews:enviro] Great Lakes for sale! Michigan's Odawa Indians lead anti-Nestle fight
- Subject: E-M:/ Fwd: [NativeNews:enviro] Great Lakes for sale! Michigan's Odawa Indians lead anti-Nestle fight
- From: Ishgooda <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 10:36:02 -0400
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- List-name: Enviro-Mich
- Reply-to: Ishgooda <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Enviro-Mich message from Ishgooda <email@example.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 03:54:37 EDT
Subject: [NativeNews:enviro] Great Lakes for sale! Michigan's Odawa Indians lead anti-Nestle fight
Great Lakes for sale! Michigan's Odawa Indians lead anti-Nestle fight
by Brian McKenna
April 22, 2006
If water is the oil of the 21st century, then Michigan, smack dab in the
middle of the Great Lakes, is Saudi Arabia. And after banging their straws at the
Big Dipper for years, Nestle Corporation has finally succeeded in plunging
into the liquid gold.
On February 28th Michigan Governor Granholm signed a bill that will, for the
first time, permit a multinational corporation to scoop up given amounts of
the Great Lakes and sell bottled water across the world. For the first time in
history the concept of the Great Lakes as a commons for all to enjoy has been
breached. And NAFTA, as we'll see, might insure a run on the Great Lakes.
The new Michigan law allows Nestle Corporation to continue its five-year
takings of up to 250,000 gallons per day and sell them at a markup well over 240
times its production cost. Nestle's profit from drawing this water could be
from $500,000 to $1.8 million per day. A key proviso is that the bottles can be
no larger than 5.7 gallons apiece.
Nestle had been ferociously fighting in court to prevent Granholm from
exercising her veto power against diversion, but with her acquiescence to the
250,000 limit, Nestle dropped its suit.
The irony is that most mainstream environmentalists compromised with Nestle
and the Governor. James Clift the policy director of the Michigan Environmental
Council (MEC), a coalition of about 70 environmental organizations, called
the new law, "a huge step forward for Michigan." Not so says Dave Dempsey, the
former Policy Director of MEC. "I think Nestle is dancing in the streets."
Dempsey is author of "On the Brink, The Great Lakes in the 21st Century."
NAFTA's Trojan Horse
Few Midwesterners are aware that the ubiquitous Nestle bottled water filling
their shopping carts is really the peoples' water. How could they know? Nestle
calls the water "Ice Mountain," and they adorn their plastic containers with
a majestic snowy Mountain, even though there are no such places in Michigan,
let alone Mecosta County where it draws the water from four wells 60 miles
North of Grand Rapids.
Truth in advertising might require Nestle to label the bottles, "Your Great
Lakes for Sale Plundered at a 24,000% mark up."
Under NAFTA's Chapter 11 corporations are protected from differential
treatment meaning that Pepsi could line up next. Once one corporation gets its foot
in the door to extract a resource there are no restrictions on others to do the
same. If barriers were put up against Pepsi, for example, they could sue
Michigan government for a potential loss of profits.
For years there has been talk about ocean tankers loading up the Great Lakes
water for the Far East, or a pipeline diverting the bounty to the dry
Southwest which has already mined the Colorado River. Michigan environmentalists
succeeded in stopping those types of water diversion - for the moment at least -
but they failed to stop this Trojan horse of privatization on the Great Lakes.
Nestle came to Michigan after former Republican Governor Engler enticed with a
sweetheart $10 million deal to create jobs after Wisconsin's citizens and
tribes kicked them out.
Largest gathering of Great Lakes Tribes since 1764
First Nations people are at the forefront in mounting challenges to Nestle
and the nation state sovereigns along several fronts. Frank Ettawageshik is
Chair of the Little Traverse Bay tribe of Indians. In February, 2002 the tribe
filed suit against Nestle and Governor Engler in federal court contending the Ice
Mountain project violated the 1986 Water Resources Development Act which
protected water as a public trust. It was later dismissed in June 2002, the judge
claiming the tribes had no right to sue.
Ettawageshik fought on, telling audiences he feared, "soon there will be bus
tours of the sunken ships of the Great Lakes," if this goes forward. He calls
the Lakes, "the white pine of the 21st century," referencing the logging
assault which felled most of Michigan's forests in the nineteenth century.
Angry that the U.S. and Canadian governments disrespected the tribes in its
2001 Great Lakes Charter, where tribes were treated as "stakeholders" not
sovereign nations, Ettawageshik deliberated with other tribes about a response.
After a while he joined John Beaucage, Grand Council Chief of the Union of
Ontario Indians to form a coalition of more than 140 tribes to sign the historic
Tribal and First Nations Great Lakes Water Accord.
The organization is called the United Indian Nations of the Great Lakes
(UINGL) and it was officially launched in April 2005 in Niagara Falls, Ontario. The
location is historically significant. It was the largest gathering of Great
Lakes native leaders since the Treaty of Niagara in 1764. That Treaty grew out
of he Royal Proclamation of 1763 which provided all land west of the Ottawa
River as Indian land.
Ettawageshik was influenced by the Water Walkers of the Great Lakes. In 2003
Indian women began journeys around the Great Lakes carrying a copper bucket
full of water. They want to recall the traditional Anishnabe role of women as
protectors of water, what they call the lifeblood of Mother Earth. So far they
have completed treks around Lakes Superior, Michigan and Huron. They begin
their walk around Lake Ontario on April 29, departing from Niagara. "We're not
stakeholders but bonafide owners," Bob Goulais, a spokesperson for the Union of
Ontario Indians, told me. "The Great Lakes are not for sale."
The tribes are supporting Clean Water Action which is beginning a petition
drive to amend Michigan's Constitution to stop privatization. "Enshrining Great
Lakes diversion protection in the Michigan Constitution may be the best and
the only way, in the end, to keep our waters from being privatized and sold off
to the highest bidders," said CWA's David Holtz.
Nestle Votes with Its Feet on March 16th
Nestle claims it cares about Great Lakes preservation but it was a no show on
March 16th when Senators Clinton, Obama, Jeffords, Levin and other
dignitaries assembled at the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works to
hear testimony from Great Lakes Governors for $20 million to preserve and
protect the Lakes. Yellow perch have declined by 80% in Lake Michigan over past 25
years due to the zebra mussel. Raw sewage is a huge problem as are exotics like
the sea lamprey which preys on native fish.
"Some of us joked that the Great Lakes should be in pristine condition for
Nestle Waters to ship it out in millions of little 12 oz. bottles!" said Mary
Lindemann, a tribe spokesperson. No matter, Senator James Inhofe, Republican
from Oklahoma, said that funding for Great Lakes restoration is unlikely in these
tight fiscal times. The nation has other priorities.
The story was different that day in Mexico City. On March 16th about 10,000
protesters marched outside the Fourth World Water Forum in Mexico City, some
"armed" with wooden rifles. Water diversions, long water lines and sewage stink
are propelling outrage. Protesters organized an alternative forum, a few miles
away, claiming that the official summit is a cover for companies that want to
privatize water services.
Nestle was central to the gathering, sponsoring five grade school students to
the official summit. Two were 12-year-old girls from Wisconsin, which sits in
the Great Lakes basin. They are part of the American Indian Science and
Engineering Society whose work focuses on the use of rice to clean and filter
water. According to Nestle, they "created awareness about the spiritual and
ecological importance of this traditional Native American plant." Meanwhile Nestle
fights the Great Lakes Indians tooth and nail in Michigan, while absenting
itself from the Senate Meeting that day in D.C. Nestle, which brought us the infant
formula scandal (in which hundreds of babies died after Nestle persuaded moms
to forego their breasts in favor of the formula which they mixed with
polluted water) has no shame.
Michigan as Tap and Dump
Picture two trucks passing one another at Michigan's border. One is taking
away tons of Michigan's fresh water while the other is bringing in tons of
That's the reality.
As the estimated 190,000 diesel powered Nestle trucks ship out Michigan water
every year, another 295,000 dump trucks enter, bearing Canadian trash. In
fiscal year 2005 the 11.5 million cubic yards of Canadian mess was equivalent to
a trail of bumper to bumper trucks stretching 1,233 miles long, each with 40
cubic yards of waste. Thanks to NAFTA, Michigan governments cannot stem the
tide, as privatized landfills make enormous profits from the commodities in
circulation, against citizen outrage. Michigan's soil and water are available to
capital at bargain basement prices. Meanwhile the polluted air from all the
trucks wafts over the Mitt, just another social cost shouldered by the lungs of
In short, the Wolverine state is now host to a neoliberal orgy of
environmental profiteering and pollution.
Tribes represent a counterculture to neoliberalism, putting forth a public
politics that underscores a collective responsibility to resist capital
Michigan Governor Granholm herself called the tribes "Michigan's original
environmentalists," when she signed an Intergovernmental Accord with them in May
2004. But she didn't listen closely enough when the tribes told her that
"Preserving the environmental quality and quantity of Great Lakes water resources
for the present and for the next seven generations is absolutely essential to
Indians are at the forefront of establishing an anti-corporate discourse and
movement. They were at the fore in Bolivia against Bechtel, on the march
against multinationals in Mexico City, and are now are at the lead in the Great
Lakes. But mainstream environmentalists typically resemble the nation's Democrats
willing to accommodate and concede, rather than stand their ground.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Enviro Briefs : a Service of Barefoot Connections
Subscription information at:http://nativenewsonline.org/natnews.htm
ENVIRO-MICH: Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action. Archives at
Postings to: firstname.lastname@example.org For info, send email to
email@example.com with a one-line message body of "info enviro-mich"