In an investment guide no less. There are a few small errors here and
there, but overall this is a remarkable work--an investment councilor
explaining the threats to wealthy people posed by global warming.|
One thing that should be pointed out that emphasizes the gravity of the challenge: the proposed panacea here (nuclear) is obviously unrealistic--by their numbers, we would have to bring a new 1000 MW nuke on stream every three days for the next 24 years--that's beyond the Nuclear Energy Institute's wildest fantasies---especially since it's thought that it would take 10 years from a standing start to get ONE on line.