[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]

Re: E-M:/ RE: / green plants, fossil fuels, biofuels

Rane and the list,

The problem is CORN BASED ETHANOL is not a small step in anything except its small net energy return.
Right now, Iowa is on the way to planting 21,000,000 acres of corn after corn with huge and growing environmental and pest problems.
And even at that level of production, the state will probably have to import 150 million bushels of corn to feed all its ethanol plants.

In Michigan, we grow a little over 2,000,000 acres of corn -- about 20 percent of our farmed land.
The problem is Michigan Corn Growers and others are pushing to build more corn based ethanol plants.
How much additional damage to water quality from this massive monoculture do we what for the Great Lakes.
And its waste stream includes Millers Grains -- a cheap but nutritional inadequate feed that will encourage the spread of CAFOs in our state.
Small biofuel plants based on methane from small manure production does make some sense on a farm basis.
But biofuels are really high subsidized, low net energy return (if at all), carbon fuel replacements from carbon fuels oil and coal. And thus they do little to address Global Warming.

This is not a good deal for anyone in Michigan except for a hand full of large corn farmers and ethanol investors.

Chris Bedford

On Nov 23, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Rane Curl wrote:

Enviro-Mich message from Rane Curl <ranecurl@engin.umich.edu>

On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, Sarah Alexis Westerman wrote:

I read this article with great interest because I have heard the article against corn many times. My question is, isn't corn supposed to be a small step toward lessening our oil dependency? I never assumed it to be "the answer," as we have just now begun to make advances and increase our consciousness of the issues. Is it really necessary to totally shun corn, when we could at least make minimal use of it while we continue on our search for better energy?

That being said, the article was very well-written, one of the most thorough arguments against corn I've read yet.

There have been a number of indictments of biofuels as practical future energy sources, one of the best being the following (with abstract):


The Future of Bio-fuels: A Blend of Hope and Concerns

Richard S Courtney


"Biomass is biological material used as fuel, and biofuel is biomass that has been converted into a form that makes it useful as a displacement for a fossil fuel; for example, petroleum. Biomass is solar energy collected by photosynthesis over a small area and a few growing seasons in plants that are not compressed and not dried. Simple calculations of the solar energy collection at the Earth's surface demonstrate that no developments of biomass can provide significant amounts of energy because the energy required to farm and harvest it is a substantial proportion of the collected solar energy. And biomass cannot be economic because the net amount of energy harvested can only be small. Indeed, governments would not need to subsidise bio-mass if it were an economically competitive fuel. But the production of biomass has potential for environmental damage by reducing biodiversity, and reliance on the use of biomass threatens energy security."


He does make the point that recovery of energy and products from waste biomaterials (such as paper, as well as agricultural wastes) can make environmental and economic sense. But replacing any significant fraction of our current fossil fuel use with biofuels is simply impossible.

I see research into biofuels production and use to have future value, especially in making use of biomaterial wastes. However it is more important to look to the longer range future when fossil fuels will be harder to obtain ("peak oil") or use ("global warming"), problems that cannot be solved with biofuels.

--Rane L Curl

ENVIRO-MICH: Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action. Archives at

Postings to: enviro-mich@great-lakes.net For info, send email to
majordomo@great-lakes.net with a one-line message body of "info enviro-mich"

Christopher B. Bedford
Center for Economic Security
#6543 Hancock Road
Montague, MI 49437
231-893-3937 (o)
231-670-4817 (c)

The Center for Economic Security conducts organizing and educational campaigns
to help business and government gain their competitive advantage from their ability to work with nature, to accept nature's order and operate within its laws.
This is called ecological intelligence.