Dave et al:
I appreciate you posting this because the
concept of DTE wanting to build a new nuclear facility in Michigan is so ludicrous that I think a lot
of folks have had a hard time reacting to it at all. Jack Lessenberry’s
piece hits a lot of the extraordinary problems with this source of electricity,
particularly for a place like Michigan, in the
heart of the Great Lakes.
Yet it is clear that the company is
floating this balloon and trying hard to sell the idea, particularly to
environmentalists, as if it is somehow a “solution” to the problem
of global warming. Golly gee -- nukes don’t produce carbon dioxide or
mercury pollution like coal plants! True -- they also don’t give you acne
or bad breath, but that sort of misses the point!
Unfortunately, the point has been missed
in a lot of ways in the debate about electric energy capacity in the state of Michigan. The
environmental community keeps pointing out that the BEST way, CHEAPEST way,
most SUSTAINABLE way to get the electricity we need for investing in the 21st
Century is to STOP WASTING IT and create real renewable sources. That is the
ONLY sensible thing to do, it is clearly the FIRST thing that must be done if
we are to be smart about the future of Michigan, but we instead have the effort
by the industry to run the propaganda machine and pretend this is a question of
whether we want a nuke or a coal plant.
Let’s just talk about one obvious
area where a large amount of electricity is routinely used without so much as a
blink of an eye: lighting of parking lots. Everyone has probably seen the “Earth
at night” photos (http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap001127.html
) which shows how much light we are creating, particularly in North
America. Among the most obvious sources of light pollution are
parking lots where gobs of electricity are eaten up in response to the concern
that there might be a safety issue associated with darkness. But instead of
asking the question of how do we assure that parking lots are safe, we seem to
have culturally bought the line that keeping them lit up as much as daylight is
the only way to make them safe. The folks who generate the electricity are
often the ones making this argument, yet we are not challenging those
assumptions. Police officers support this, and so others do as well -- but
instead of ever going back and asking if the Wal-Mart ¼ mile from my house
needs to have its extraordinarily bright parking lot lights all left on full
power all night so that they shine in the windows of all the neighbors even
though the store is only open until 10 or 11 at night, we as a society have
simply accepted as a given that our only choice is to rob our future
generations of a viable planet in order to possibly deter some potential
Energy efficiency is not about doing
without -- it is about “investing” our brainpower in the future of
Michigan and making sure the 21st Century is in fact one where we
are competitive by being a heck of a lot smarter, using our resources more
intelligently, and not allowing companies like DTE to convince us that we get
to choose only from column A or B. It is hard to think anyone would take more
nukes in Michigan
seriously -- but apparently DTE and others are banking on not overestimating
the willingness and ability of Michiganders to actually engage creatively in
trying to solve our energy problems.
Anne Woiwode, State Director
Sierra Club Michigan Chapter
Behalf Of David Holtz
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007
To: enviro Mich
Subject: E-M:/ Michigan's Nuclear Question
DTE energy wants to build
a new nuclear plant in Michigan,
a really dumb idea that is not getting the attention it deserves in the environmental
community. Columnist Jack Lessenberry writes about it in the Metro Times.
do we do — what do all the nation's nuclear plants do — with the
spent nuclear fuel? This is especially a problem for DTE Energy. The stuff
remains radioactive and highly dangerous for thousands of years.
three years, they will run out of room to store the rods in the huge fuel
storage pool they now maintain on the site. Then, they will have no alternative
but to store it in heavy steel containers known as "dry casks."
the casks will pile up. And up and up and up. Something similar is happening at
nuclear power plants across the country. Michigan's
first nuclear plant, Big Rock, near Charlevoix, was torn down years ago. Not a
that is, for a building holding the spent fuel rods. There are pools and piles
of these things all over the nation. The most logical thing — especially
in the age of terror — would be to have one central site where all this
stuff is to be safely stored and guarded.
there is supposed to be one — the Yucca Mountain Repository in Nevada. The federal
government agreed on this as the place years ago. After numerous delays, it is
now on course to start accepting nuclear waste ... 10 years from now, on March
31, 2017, Al Gore's 69th birthday. Except that ... it probably won't happen.
Why? For one thing, the new Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, is from Nevada, and doesn't want
his peeps irradiated.
is dead. It will never happen," he says.