[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
E-M:/ American Progress Report - major environment section today....
- Subject: E-M:/ American Progress Report - major environment section today....
- From: "Alex J. Sagady & Associates" <ajs@sagady.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:17:55 -0400
- Delivered-to: enviro-mich-archive@glc.org
- Delivered-to: enviro-mich@great-lakes.net
- List-name: Enviro-Mich
- Reply-to: "Alex J. Sagady & Associates" <ajs@sagady.com>
Exerpt from AMERICAN PROGRESS REPORT listserv daily
report
http://www.americanprogress.org/
ENVIRONMENT
Hypersensitive And Still In Denial
On Sunday, while citizens and environmentalists around the world
celebrated
Earth Day "with events aimed at protecting nature and
raising awareness about global warming," President Bush failed
to even mention the words "global warming" in his
annual Earth Day address. Bush also failed to mention the issue in a
State of the Union address
until this year. This weekend, senior political adviser Karl Rove
demonstrated once again the great lengths to which the White House will
go to avoid talking about global warming. When singer Sheryl Crow and An
Inconvenient Truth producer Laurie David asked Rove to rethink Bush's
position on global warming, Rove
"
exploded" at the duo. "We asked Mr. Rove if he would
consider taking a fresh look at the science of global warming. Much to
our dismay, he immediately got combative. ... Anger flaring, Mr. Rove
immediately regurgitated the official Administration position on global
warming," they said. The White House defended Rove's temper
flare-up, arguing that Crow and David did not "afford the president
the same
respect that they are asking for." The White House's
over-sensitivity on the matter may come from the fact that it is out of
step with
three-quarters of the American public and is growing more and more
isolated on dealing one of the
world's biggest threats.
'A MODEL FOR THE WORLD': While the Bush has taken only tiny steps to
address global climate change, the White House maintains that its
approach is a
"
model for the world." "The Bush administration is now and
always has been
committed to cutting greenhouse gas emissions and confronting climate
change. President Bush's concern about climate change is not new and has
been a top priority for the president ever since his first year in
office," said two of Bush's top science advisers. But on at least
three occasions last year, Bush claimed there was still a
"debate" among scientists on whether global warming is man-made
or natural. The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has issued
"history's most definitive statement of
scientific consensus on climate change." Shirking his electoral
promise to
curb carbon dioxide emissions, greenhouse gas emissions have steadily
increased during Bush's tenure, giving the United States the dubious
title of being the
"
world's largest source of greenhouse gases."
NATIONAL SECURITY AT STAKE: A team of retired military generals,
including the
former Army chief of staff and Bush's former chief Middle East
negotiator, released a study last week on how "global climate change
presents a
serious national security threat that could affect Americans at home,
impact U.S. military operations and heighten global tensions."
"The report warned that in the next 30 to 40 years there will be
wars over water, increased hunger instability from worsening disease
and rising sea levels and global warming-induced refugees." Sen.
John McCain (R-AZ) discussed these issues in a major climate policy
speech yesterday. Echoing the generals' study, McCain said, "The
world is already feeling the powerful effects of global warming, and far
more dire consequences are predicted if we let the growing deluge of
greenhouse gas emissions continue." Despite issuing such
reality-based rhetoric, there is reason to question McCain's sincerity.
On the same day of the speech, McCain announced that
former Defense Secretary James Schlesinger "will advise
[McCain's] campaign on energy and national security issues."
Schlesinger is a
prominent global warming denier who has asserted that
"
we simply do not know what extent" greenhouse gases contribute
to global warming.
THE NEED FOR CARBON LIMITS: Some prominent conservatives have parted
with their
ranks and publicly acknowledged the human cause of global warming.
For example, Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) "said he
accepts there is a general consensus among scientists that Earth has
gotten warmer over the last century and that humans have contributed to
that problem,
conceding that his views might not find favor with some of his fellow
conservatives." In a debate with Sen. John Kerry (D-MA), Gingrich
distanced himself from skeptics like Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK),
asserting that "the evidence is sufficient that we should
move towards the most effective possible steps to reduce carbon-loading
of the atmosphere." While his recognition of global warming is a
welcome step, Gingrich's
strict market-based solutions are not tenable. "[Gingrich]
believes the best way to solve the problem is to unleash the spirit of
American entrepreneurship, not the power of government. 'Regulation and
litigation are the least effective methods of getting to
solutions,'" he argued. In response, Kerry asserted, "You can't
just sit there and say, oh, let the market respond. That's like saying,
Barry Bonds, go investigate steroids. Or like saying, Enron, you take
over the pensions for America. Not going to happen." Kerry instead
advocated a
ceiling on carbon emissions, which is being successfully implemented
in California and is predicted to be a
boon to the state's economy. Such caps, like the limit on sulfur
emissions in the 1990 Clean Air Act, have been
effective environmental and public health strategies. Last week, a
bipartisan group of Senators pledged to introduce "legislation that
would
cap carbon emissions from power plants."
CONGRESS TAKES THE REIGNS: Environmental Protection Agency
administrator Stephen Johnson will testify today in front of the
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. His testimony comes
in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling that the federal government
"does indeed have
authority to regulate greenhouse gases linked to global warming"
despite the White House's claim to the contrary. "In his prepared
remarks, Johnson asserts that even before the Supreme Court decision,
'the Administration had been
implementing aggressive steps to tackle climate change.'"
Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) responded, "When I called him to task
on the environmental rollbacks, he gave a speech on how wonderful
everything is.
He doesn't get it, or he doesn't want to get it." Johnson
"will be flanked by two of his predecessors -- a Republican and
Democrat -- who believe the Bush administration is
downright truculent in its opposition to a greenhouse gas regulatory
scheme." Boxer said she will press Johnson on climate change today.
"When EPA Administrator Steve Johnson comes before my committee
today,
I will challenge him to use the power EPA has had all along to
address global warming, and has refused to use."
==========================================
Alex J. Sagady & Associates
http://www.sagady.com
Environmental Enforcement, Permit/Technical Review, Public Policy,
Expert Witness Review and Litigation Investigation on Air, Water and
Waste/Community Environmental and Resource Protection
Prospectus at:
http://www.sagady.com/sagady.pdf
657 Spartan Ave, East Lansing, MI 48823
(517) 332-6971; (517) 332-8987 (fax); ajs@sagady.com
==========================================