Ditto. Not to mention where the hydrogen
comes from. That's where the cradle-to-grave analysis is
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: E-M:/ Hybrid cars
Enviro-Mich message from RC
I've wondered how much of the 'big-3' giving the market away to the Japanese
was due to racism and jingoism.
'Green' is the new 'organic' which IMO
lost some meaning in 2001/2002 when the FDA changed the rules on what makes
I'm in a personal quandary. I have a vehicle that
gets on average 15mpg. Gas is now safely over $3 per gallon. Rumoured to stay
there and possibly crest $4! Is it 'Enron trickery'? I think so but in today's
political climate will a politician of any persuasion be able to stand up to
their corporate masters and punch Goliath in the eye. What should I do now.
Buy a green car and park the gas thirsty monster?
cars... If the total amount of 'green-ness' out ways the creation of said
vehicle then the result is good. I guess that's a question left to others to
figure out if the degree of environmental return is 'worth it'. I do think
that 'market based' and 'voluntary measures' aren't going to do anything
except make people feel better and while we need to feel better, we also need
to make the environment better...
Washington has shifted their policy
concerning welfare from a person centric to a corporation centric focus.
Nuclear (nukular) power has their hands out and so do the major oil companies
and the big-3 and airlines. Meaningful change in the environment is going to
result in pain being felt by many entrenched political players. It seems that
the areas that really need the money and subsidies aren't in political favor,
or connected enough to get their time at the trough. That has to change and
it's very unlikely that it will unless there is a sea change of monumental
proportions at the federal level.
On the whole donations angle, when I
consider how much of my tax money is 'donated' by my government to further
line the pockets of corporations actively working against the environment, I
feel that giving *anything* to the environmental cause is my way of trying to
cancel out my government's support... I wish I had more money to give... Being
in business I realize that you have to spend money to make money. I just ask
that a substantial amount of 'my' money go to the projects that I feel the
group (and I) support...
We perhaps should be able to earmark our tax
payments to not go to industry pockets that target the environment but since
we can't, we have to do what we (I) can...
Regarding education. It was
widely reported that after a photo-op at the US capital showing new hydrogen
fuel cell cars, Dennis Hastert drove out of the presentation in the hydrogen
car, stopped at his H-U-G-E SUV (Ford Excursion), got out of the 'green' car
and into his behemoth and drove off... The general public isn't quite so
stupid not to see that the conversion of the politicos to the 'green' mantra
is only skin deep... Plus add the incredible effect of the Bush economy and
many people can't afford to fix their existing cars let alone buy anything
new... 'Green' is also viewed as something like 'french' or 'elitist' to
people programmed by empty calorie info-tainment tv programming...
world is being gamed in so many ways now... It's hard to know which end is
At 09:23 AM
5/25/2007, William Tobler wrote:
And this is one of
the roles that the environmental groups should be playing, and have failed
miserably IMHO. This is consumer education, and changing "not green"
consumers into "green" consumers that are willing to pay at least the costs
to be green. Companies can't subsidize these products for very
ENVIRO-MICH: Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental and
Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action. Archives at
http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/enviro-mich/ Postings to:
firstname.lastname@example.org For info, send email to email@example.com
with a one-line message body of "info enviro-mich"
What the big 3 did and I criticize
them strongly for was to abandon the small, higher efficiency car market to
the Asian imports because more profit could be generated elsewhere. It was a
wrong green decision, but was also a wrong corporate sustainability
decision. First, you give away a very substantial market share.
Second, you give away the "entry" level market to fierce competitors, and
those "entry" level consumers will some day be shopping for something more
fancy but consumer loyalty is a major factor. And third, you are not
prepared to survive the next gas/energy crisis. This was a blunderous
corporate decision made 8 - 10 years ago.
am not at all convinced that hybrids are especially green anyway. 1st,
it takes a considerable amount of new resources to make a hybrid (in part,
reflected by the incremental price). Second, it takes a considerable
amount of resources to dispose and recycle things like the batteries and
electronics (IF it gets done). Third, those manufacturing and disposal
industries for electronics and batteries are not exactly the greenest thing
around based on their histories (I've got an industrial recycling yard near
my home - not, not, not green) . Fourth, the hybrid feature in hybrids
is not beneficial for those of us who are predominately freeway
drivers. For these people, high fuel economy comes from elsewhere,
which may or may not be included in a hybrid car. The job function of
a coworker of mine was to perform "cradle-to-grave" analyses on some of
these questions, instead of the half-truths that one sees bantered around.
And lastly, I have a limited number of
dollars that I can dedicate to green. Whether this is donations to
environmental groups, donations to politicians and then the extra expense
related to things like recycling, and then just trying to live
greener. I see much (most) of those donation dollars WASTED on the
next campaign to get more dollars, and the infighting, instead of being used
for the purpose given.
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Chuck
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 10:56 PM
- Subject: Re: E-M:/ Hybrid cars
- I find one of the "decision" factors in selecting cars to be quite
interesting. Re hybrids, invariably "payback statistics come
up. I wonder how often that criteria is applied to the many options
one can get when shopping for different versions of different makes. My
bet is that payback has very little to do with people's selection.
If they want a red car with air, Bose stereo, ABS, how many of them worry
about the payback ? But just let the topic of being green come up
and all of a sudden - "it just isn't practical given the
payback...." becomes the mantra. There are other reasons than
personal finance to select "green" maybe?