[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
Re: E-M:/ Good news long overdue
Enviro-Mich message from "The Henry's" <email@example.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexander J. Sagady" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: E-M:/ Good news long overdue
At 12:03 PM 06/02/2007, you wrote:
''The Saginaw Bay has been identified as one of the worst environmental
problem areas in the Great Lakes,'' Barcia said in testimony before the
''The results have been a diminished quality of life for area residents
and business and a threat to a vital freshwater resource for over 500,000
It doesn't look like Barcia's remedy is appropriate to the problem....
The article says:
"in testimony before the committee, Barcia said the $520,000 in federal
money would go to promote regional tourism, fund a pilot project to
identify the sources of algae and E. coli bacteria washing up along
shorelines, protect and restore high quality wetlands, control invasive
phragmite plants, assist with dredging costs, restore the Saginaw River
corridor and launch a voluntary effort to reduce phosphorous loading to
''The public health and safety of these residents and the economic
vitality of local communities are threatened by the ongoing environmental
problems facing Saginaw Bay,''
Barcia looks at this problem and sees "pork barrel" opportunity and then
uses it as a public relations opportunity.
First, I have no idea why it is appropriate for the federal government to
promotion of regional tourism and that doesn't have anything to do with
control programs to solve
the algae problem.
Second, this Saginaw Bay problem is far beyond the scope of "pilot
to address in identifying the source of algae. The problem is a
Michigan narrative water quality standards, but MDEQ's posture is to
narrative water quality standard enforcement and listings of impaired
waterways under the Clean Water Act.
Despite the high priority and visibility of this problem, MDEQ has been
violating the Clean Water Act for many years by failing to properly
identify both Saginaw Bay as impaired for nutrients and violations of
Michigan narrative water quality standards. Michigan and MDEQ also
violate the Clean Water Act by failing to list the entire Saginaw
River watershed along with Saginaw Bay as nutrient impaired.
Michigan also violates the Clean Water Act by failing to impose
water quality based effluent limitations for phosphorus on concentrated
animal feeding operations in the form a mandatory best management practice
requirement for phosphorus planning in comprehensive nutrient
management plans (CNMPs). Under phosphorus planning in CNMPs,
CAFO animal waste spreading operations are not allowed to apply more
phosphorus in both animal waste and artificial fertilizers than would be
used by the crop in the current growing season. A ban on winter
application of animal waste should also be imposed.
Until phosphorus planning is implemented, CAFO animal waste applicators
will continue with nitrogen planning which means that animal waste
lands will continue to receive many times the amount of phosphorus than
is taken up in crops grown in any given year.
Despite repeated attempts to bring the matter before MDEQ, the agency
still refuses to impose appropriate water quality based effluent
in CAFO permits and allows impermissible water quality degradation from
additional CAFOs going into areas that are already impaired.
Agriculture in the entire Saginaw River watershed is not living up to
clear requirements to control both sediment and phosphorus pollution
MDEQ at every opportunity....whether through the impairment listing
the permitting process... undermines these clear requirements for
water quality impairment identification and water quality based effluent
MDEQ's law violations in failing to have clear identification of all
nitrate and turbidity water quality violations is a systematic failure.
it likely that they will never change and they will have to be sued in
comply with the Clean Water Act.
In my opinion, getting more money for "voluntary" programs to control
phosphorus and providing money for dredging programs is actually
harmful to the cause of Saginaw Bay cleanup. What we have now
is a so-called "voluntary" program in the form of administrative agency
and agricultural industry
sandbagging of clear statutory requirements. And where do you think
that dredging money is going to go and where will the dredge spoils go?
If you pump money to drain commissioners in the watershed, you're
just going to end up with more sediment impaired waterways where
MDEQ refuses to acknowledge water quality problems with their
Category 4 off-ramp approaches to problem identification. And look
for those dredge spoils to go into wetlands that the money is supposed to
There will be no "cleanup" of Saginaw Bay until and unless the issues
above are addressed. Any public relations posturing by Sen. Barcia
that doesn't confront the water pollution control realities and clear
statutory requirements presently being violated means only that
the public is being misled by politicians that ought to grow some
gonads if they are going to claim the leadership mantel for cleanup
of the Saginaw Bay.
Alex J. Sagady & Associates http://www.sagady.com
Environmental Enforcement, Permit/Technical Review, Public Policy,
Expert Witness Review and Litigation Investigation on Air, Water and
Waste/Community Environmental and Resource Protection
Prospectus at: http://www.sagady.com/sagady.pdf
657 Spartan Avenue, East Lansing, MI 48823
(517) 332-6971; (517) 332-8987 (fax); email@example.com
ENVIRO-MICH: Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action. Archives at
Postings to: firstname.lastname@example.org For info, send email to
email@example.com with a one-line message body of "info enviro-mich"