[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
Re: E-M:/ Love mountains? Hate coal!
- Subject: Re: E-M:/ Love mountains? Hate coal!
- From: "Robert Isaac" <rjisaac@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 22:58:35 -0500
- Delivered-to: enviro-mich-archive@glc.org
- Delivered-to: enviro-mich@great-lakes.net
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=W0p+JlWvwZr48OyqItva7c/xpdrSff/xeMd5yljQ4ZM=; b=X+1S2+mfSIKJ/o45LsB34vsvgPb7i9MrrcO+0TLXV7/0qTX6RSvGeMBVDlMiVkcW69DXd184NxRyxoE7SPlaUbWZx4iFDZRlTUTVnhyZTkmUDRnVjD18/ewxX6yNL2xYGW1cvkdFYgz6sm1e7gNdUR7/f4Z+1X6HC8Kkx9owZ2I=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dnpgbHDrbFq6b1SB327KTEM6gx+1cUnngJNF17LPzpdPknU9XfNWjiH2OZZx1VkzefGcL4DUx2b0zx8CW95+Qi3k1WirPIHjpevVvHS6/my/Vw/jem8I2JxseHCGjKT68lrjEZjAA4XSqeoRt4fMpcTqGvNual8lZiAPuVWUnsk=
- In-reply-to: <200712011658.lB1GwiVT028925@smtp-out-65.up.net>
- List-name: Enviro-Mich
- References: <bca.1a265d6e.3481c99b@aol.com> <E1IyHFZ-0002sN-Gs@sys14.mail.msu.edu> <3b47d0520711302118v73177736kbc3e7c8542029611@mail.gmail.com> <200712011658.lB1GwiVT028925@smtp-out-65.up.net>
- Reply-to: "Robert Isaac" <rjisaac@gmail.com>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enviro-Mich message from "Robert Isaac" <rjisaac@gmail.com>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
As opposed to a dropping water table, springs and creeks drying up,
and being forced to move off your ancestral land because you can no
longer find water for your animals and crops?
http://www.sacredland.org/endangered_sites_pages/black_mesa.html
http://www.stoppeabody.org/
They are both bad.
> I can think of several reasons why the issue is often more severe in
> the Appalachians:
>
> 1. Higher rainfall. This can result in
> a. More flash floods, landslides, etc.
> b. More acid drainage from waste rock and mines
> 2. Higher sulfur coal in the Appalachians, resulting in
> increased water acidity
> 3. Typically, steeper terrain in the Appalachians, resulting
> in more flash floods, landslides, etc.
> 4. There are fewer places for Appalachian folks to live. To
> live close to a mine, one must almost always live in a narrow
> valley. I worked for a number of years for the West Virginia
> Geological and Economic Survey (a state agency), and pored over every
> topo map that covers the state. In most of southwestern WV, where
> the majority of the mountaintop removal takes place in that state,
> the only reasonably flat areas (until mountaintop removal occurs!)
> are the narrow floodplains of streams. Exposing excavated rock and
> haul roads to heavy rainfall causes excessively high stream levels,
> and damage to homes, roads, etc. In addition, the streams are often
> so acidic that they contain no game fish, and if you try to swim in
> them your eyes sting horribly. Whole counties are like this. In the
> west, there are plenty of flat areas near the mines for housing, and
> there are plenty of clean streams around.
>
> See the attached topo map of Red Jacket WV for typical SW WV
> topography. The purple stipled pattern shows strip mines. Note the
> ringed pattern surrounding the hill whose summit is 2031 feet in the
> western part of the map. There is most likely valuable coal still
> left under that summit and above the uppermost strip mine. Removing
> the "country rock" (mostly sandstone and shale) above that strip mine
> would enable them to get to that coal more easily. Likewise, some of
> the lower coal seams (represented by lower strip mines) might be
> candidates as well.
>
> Much of eastern KY is very similar, as well as parts of western VA
> and even SE OH, though the hills in OH is lower. Farther north, most
> current coal mines are underground mines, which have their own
> problems (e.g., subsidence. This damages homes and roads, and even
> caused a popular state park lake to drain into the ground near the SW
> corner of PA. The coal company has made no effort to deal with the issue.).
>
> ` -doug-
>
>
> At 12:18 AM 12/1/2007, Robert Isaac wrote:
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Enviro-Mich message from "Robert Isaac" <rjisaac@gmail.com>
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > Is
> > > one method less destructive to the environment than another?
> >
> >I would classify the western strip/pit mines to be just as bad as
> >blowing a hill up in the south.
> >
> >==============================================================
> >ENVIRO-MICH: Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
> >and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action. Archives at
> >http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/enviro-mich/
> >
> >Postings to: enviro-mich@great-lakes.net For info, send email to
> >majordomo@great-lakes.net with a one-line message body of "info enviro-mich"
> >==============================================================
>
> Doug Welker
> 26344 Tauriainen Road
> Pelkie MI 49958
> dwelker@up.net
> (906) 338-2680
>
> Never underestimate the power of human greed.
>
>
==============================================================
ENVIRO-MICH: Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action. Archives at
http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/enviro-mich/
Postings to: enviro-mich@great-lakes.net For info, send email to
majordomo@great-lakes.net with a one-line message body of "info enviro-mich"
==============================================================