[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]

E-M:/ RE: / the western UP mining district

Here are some of the latest news articles about the potential for a new sulfide mining district that could stretch from the central UP to the North Shore in Minnesota.


In The News

Congressman Stupak opposing potential mine

More Mines?

6 More Mines?


Please take the time to share these results with your area legislators, etc.  Remember what the politicians say? "Prove that you're winning (with voters) and we're with you all the way." -DH


TV 6 Poll Results - 10:50 am 12/20/07


What kind of impact will the proposed nickel and copper mine have on the U.P.?   Positive or Negative


     Current Vote:  70% Negative



Mining Journal Poll Results - 10:50 am 12/20/07


Do you agree with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality's decision to approve the Kennecott mine permit?


Yes – 39%

No – 61%




With Regards,


Alexis Raney


Save The Wild UP

PO Box 562, Marquette, MI 49855

413 N. Third St., Marquette, MI 49855


From: owner-enviro-mich@great-lakes.net [mailto:owner-enviro-mich@great-lakes.net] On Behalf Of John Rebers
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 3:25 PM
To: 'Dave Dempsey'; enviro-mich@great-lakes.net
Subject: E-M:/ RE: / the western UP mining district


Several other companies are exploring in the area as well. In addition to the Rio Tinto exploration mentioned below, there is exploration going on in the Menominee/Marinette area that is pretty far along. Other companies are exploring for nickel, diamonds and uranium. If I recall correctly, some of the diamond sites are underneath the McCormick Wilderness area in the Ottawa National Forest (which is not exempt from mining).


One of the real concerns here is that the DEQ has set a very low bar for compliance with Michigan’s Part 632 Mining Law. None of the other companies will expect to need a permit application any better than Kennecott’s flawed application to get a permit.


John Rebers


From: owner-enviro-mich@great-lakes.net [mailto:owner-enviro-mich@great-lakes.net] On Behalf Of Dave Dempsey
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 1:24 PM
To: enviro-mich@great-lakes.net
Subject: E-M:/ the western UP mining district


Now they tell us, after DEQ grants approval to a nickel/copper mine at the headwaters of the Salmon Trout/Yellow Dog rivers.

Rio Tinto news release dated 17 December 2007:

"Our focus is on six further adjacent prospects that may have the potential to extend significantly the mine life at current planned production rates."

Perhaps "six further adjacent prospects" and others now pursued by other companies should have been part of an environmental impact study before permits for any new mines were issued. Is the western UP now going to be carved up for mining?