|
In addition to the citizen
lawsuit seeking an injunction against new coal plants (see below), there are
other reasons why there should be a moratorium on new 1. All three viable
presidential candidates (Clinton, Obama and McCain) stated they will work hard
to fight global warming and reduce CO2, mercury and other harmful emissions.
More stringent federal and state emissions regulation and
enforcement are coming and new plants should not be considered until
then. 2. At an IPU conference last month,
MPSC
Chairman Orjiakor Isiogu stated that the 21st Century Energy Plan
(21CEP) needs and will be updated for Michigan's (poor) economic situation,
(greatly increased) cost of coal and coal plant construction and probable (CO2)
emissions regulation. Updating the 21CEP for these factors, plus logical
assumptions for renewable energy and efficiency, will reveal that far fewer new
coal plants are needed in 3. Across the country,
utility companies, their investors, courts, state regulators, legislators and
governors have canceled or put a moratorium on new coal plants at least until
CO2 and other emission regulation is stabilized. Even in Republican Idaho,
their house of representatives voted 64-5 in favor of a
two year
moratorium
on the building of new coal-fired power plants. http://www.kmvt.com/news/local/2503506.html It would seem prudent for
Take care, frank FOR RELEASE THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 7,
2008 1:00 P.M. Joseph P. Swallow (989)
354-4104 judgeswallow@charterinternet.com For copy of legal Complaint – Marcia
L. Smolinski (989) 354-4104 Ext. 11 judgeswallow@charterinternet.com Citizen lawsuit seeks injunction
against new coal plants until state’s DEQ establishes rules governing carbon
dioxide pollution In a legal action with potentially far-reaching
consequences, a Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. |