|
Anyone supporting coal fire power should
be forced to have a tour of Appalachian coal region to see the affects on
ecosystems, human settlements, and the lives of those who labor in those
fields. One might begin with Kentuckians for the Commonwealth http://www.kftc.org/blog/archive/2008/01/15/take-a-virtual-flyover
. Mountaintop removal techniques don’t even create that many jobs. This
is short sighted in my opinion. Mr. Lark affirmed the role of solar here Terry Link, One planet, One family,
One future From:
owner-enviro-mich@great-lakes.net [mailto:owner-enviro-mich@great-lakes.net] On Behalf Of Apparently the idea that Michigan already has 5 new, additive coal
plant proposals with 2300 + MW added capacity either approved (NMU @ 10 MW) or
under consideration for air permits (Holland BPW @ 78 MW, Consumers Energy Karn
Weadock @ 930 MW, Wolverine in Rogers City @ 600, and Dynegy/LS Power in
Midland @ 750 MW), is not enough to discourage Lansing Board of Water and Light
to propose its own 250 MW facility next to Lansing. Oh that’s right
-- DTE also wants a nuclear plant too, at least two other coal facilities are
also being actively discussed (Alma M&M Energy and Tondu’s Filer
Twp). The particular irony here is that the head of BWL, Peter Lark, was the
head of the MI Public Service Commission 21st Century Energy Plan
issued in 2007 that said that Michigan needs only 1 base load electric plant if
the state does what needs to be done to save energy and employ readily
available renewable sources. In fact, while Mr. Lark is quoted below
saying demand is growing, when in fact many other electric and non-electric
observers say
BWL
plans new $1B plant near Delta Twp. facility Customers want more energy. Regulators want it cleaner. And a local power company says the way to appease both is
with a new $1 billion power plant. Lansing Board of Water & Light on Tuesday announced
plans to build a mostly coal-fired plant near its existing Two-thirds of the electricity generated at the new plant
would come from low-sulfur coal. Biomass such as waste wood, paper and crop
residue would fuel the rest. Customers will pay for construction, according to the BWL,
through 30- or 40-year bonds. Those bonds are then to be funded with an
estimated 7 percent rate increase. In all, the plant would produce 250 megawatts at any given
moment, enough to light up 125,000 homes and to help BWL keep pace with what it
sees as increased demand by businesses and residents alike. "We are growing," BWL General Manager J. Peter
Lark said. "There's no doubt about it. We are providing more electricity
than ever before." SNIP http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080528/NEWS01/805280353 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Anne M. Woiwode, State Director Sierra Club Visit us at http://michigan.sierraclub.org/index.shtml Act Today: Join our Legislative Alerts System! http://mackinac.sierraclubaction.org Act FOR Tomorrow: Support the Sierra Club Michigan Chapter
- contact "The idea of shifting to a carbon-free society
appears to be technically feasible. The question is whether it's politically
feasible or economically feasible." Brian O'Neil, |