Contrary to Attorney General Cox's assertion, Gov. Granholm's order is "firmly grounded in state and federal law" according to Wayne Law Prof. Noah Hall:|
As Prof. Hall states, the executive directive "specifically acknowledges the state’s duty under the Michigan Environmental Protection Act to prevent pollution when 'there is a feasible and prudent alternative.'" It further relies on the federal Clean Air Act, Section 165(a)(2), for the state’s authority to consider alternatives to proposed sources of air emissions when determining whether or not to grant a permit."
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:22:31 -0500
Subject: Re: E-M:/ Cox says coal ban is illegal
To: HAMILTREEF@aol.com; email@example.com
The Saginaw News headline story today ( not on line) is the same coverage with headlines reading:
Coal plants notch a win: Ruling may advance plant near Bay City.
The Saginaw News story identified Rep. Ken Horn of Saginaw County (R-94th) as one of the two legislators that took the issue to the attorney general. Rep Horn, married to the Vice Chair of the Saginaw County Chambers of Commerce, also never misses an opportunity to bash environmental regulation/MDEQ as an obstacle to "growth" and he has been an advocate of Dow Chemical's position to lower the state standard for dioxin exposure from 90 ppt to 1,000 ppt for residential properties. He also supported lifting the " facility designation" on contaminated river properties which would limit Dow's obligations to clean them up.
If the Chamber or Dow or Consumers wants it---Ken Horn wants it. Public health, Great Lakes water quality and natural resources be damned.
Michelle Hurd Riddick
Lone Tree Council
In a message dated 2/21/2009 10:02:42 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, HAMILTREEF@aol.com writes:
Need a job? Find an employment agency near you.
Windows Live™: Discover 10 secrets about the new Windows Live. View post.