[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
E-M:/ The biggest environmental challenge right now
- Subject: E-M:/ The biggest environmental challenge right now
- From: Larry Nooden <ldnum@umich.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:59:42 -0400
- Delivered-to: enviro-mich-archive@glc.merit.edu
- Delivered-to: enviro-mich@glc.merit.edu
- List-name: Enviro-Mich
- Reply-to: Larry Nooden <ldnum@umich.edu>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enviro-Mich message from Larry Nooden <ldnum@umich.edu>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it is the relentless and ruthless attacks coming from radical-right
talk show hosts (e.g., Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, et al. on WJR, 760 am
Detroit and other radio stations) and partisan TV stations (e.g., Fox). At
this time, they are focused on President Obama's economic initiatives, but
that includes his energy policies. Many of our fellow citizens accept
these highly partisan infomercial/infotainment sources as the whole truth
and nothing but the truth. With his scientific expertise, Rush (Jan.,
2009) feels qualified to inform his followers that “Man-made global warming
is a hoax.”
Compared to this battle, the CAFOs, Dow Chemical, etc. (important as they
are) are minor skirmishes. The stakes are high as demagogues clammer for
ever more power. This battle could easily trump all the others.
These talk show moderators/hosts practice some remarkable techniques for
shutting out/putting down differing ideas, even the simple facts, and
retaining their faithful followings. For example, Sean Hannity will turn
down the volume and blur the voices of callers if they express a dissenting
idea and then cut them off as insulting if he can not handle the topic,
even if they are polite and correct on facts. Fox TV hosts bring on
guests with differing ideas, but talk right over them (a technique called
'eating alive') when their answers head in unwanted directions, and/or they
bring on “light weights” and then “run over” over them. Clearly, they are
only interested in promoting their political agendas no matter what it
takes. Their influence is so great that the editor of the journal Science
(a weekly publication of the American Association for the Advancement of
Science) laments the educational deficiencies that leave so many unable to
understand what is wrong (Alberts B [2009] Redefining Science Education.
Science 323:437). It's a major problem that is affecting our environment,
consumer protection and even democracy.
Who profits from this and who pays Rush Limbaugh $400,000,000+/8 years?
Even lower-level spokespersons seem very highly paid. This is a very, very
big business; a small number of people made an enormous amount of money
from application of these political ideologies in the recent past. It is
also political campaign financing with no limits and little or no scrutiny.
In spite of pious claims, these radical right-wing ideologies have produced
antienvironmetal and social results that run counter to the prosocial
mandates of all the major religions, especially Christianity.
Solutions? Get these partisan infomercials/infotainments out into the
open, at least the more outrageous stuff. Make sure the suppressed/
omitted facts reach these audiences somehow. Who can do it? MoveOn.org,
the Sierra Club, League of Conservation Voters, others?
LCV has an interesting start on this: <http://www.withusorwithrush.org/>
=============================================================ENVIRO-MICH: Internet List and Forum for Michigan Environmental
and Conservation Issues and Michigan-based Citizen Action. Archives at
http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/enviro-mich/
Postings to: enviro-mich@great-lakes.net For info, send email to
majordomo@great-lakes.net with a one-line message body of "info enviro-mich"
=============================================================* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
All views and opinions presented above are solely those of the author or
attributed source and do not necessarily reflect those of GLIN or the Great Lakes Commission.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *