[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
People Who Are Interested In Stopping Radioactive Metal From Being Recycled Into Consumer Products
- Subject: People Who Are Interested In Stopping Radioactive Metal From Being Recycled Into Consumer Products
- From: Debby Ortman <lakes@cp.duluth.mn.us>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 16:03:19 -0800
- List-Name: GLIN-Announce
TO: People Who Are Interested In Stopping Radioactive Metal From Being
Recycled Into Consumer Products
FROM: Jessica Vallette, Organizer for Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy
Project
DATE: January 20, 1998
RE: Sample Letter For Publication & Distribution
We Need Your Help Now! The nuclear industry and their government allies are
at it again! They want to recycle radioactive metal scrap from nuclear power
plants and DOE weapons facilities into household items. Citizens must act
now to stop this sham recycling scheme.
What's Happening: The DOE has a huge stockpile of radioactive scrap metal.
One proposed "disposal" method is to recycle it into consumer products.
Before DOE can proceed with this irresponsible plan, they need the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set standards. EPA has begun this
process by writing a Preliminary Technical Support Document and the
Preliminary Cost-Benefit Analysis. These documents look at the feasibility
of recycling radioactive scrap metal into consumer products. This the
beginning of a rulemaking that could result in radioactive metal being made
into strollers, appliances, bedframes, beltbuckles-- anything made from
metal. These documents are available on their website:
http://www.epa.gov/radiation/scrap/scrappub.htm
Background: Throughout the 1980's, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission along
with the Department of Energy (DOE), sought to deregulate radioactive waste
and call it "below regulatory concern". Under this scheme, roughly 30% of
the nation's "low-level" radioactive waste could be treated as normal
garbage and disposed of in municipal solid waste landfills or incinerators.
Furthermore it would have allowed production of consumer goods from these
materials, most frequently by recycling the waste scrap.
What You Can Do: The public is being asked to review and send in their
comments on these documents by January 31, 1998. Please print the attached
sample letter in your respective newsletters and request that the letters be
carbon copied and sent both to your organization and to me. These letters
will demonstrate to the EPA and the DOE that the "stake holders" are not
just industry organizations--this action would effect all Americans. EPA
must be told to set a standard that would not raise the "background" level
of radiation that everyone is exposed to. Tell them to set a zero tolerance
level. By doing so, we might be able to stop this process NOW.
Your Name
Your Address
Your Daytime Phone (optional)
John Karhnak
US EPA Cleanup and Reuse Center
401 M Street, SW (6602J)
Washington, DC 20460
Re: Radioactive Metal Scrap Preliminary Technical Support Document and
Preliminary Cost-Benefit Analysis
Dear Mr. Karhnak:
I am writing to express my concern about the Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA) proposal to allow radioactive metal scrap into the consumer
market. It is my understanding that this material could be "recycled" into
strollers, appliances, bedframes, beltbuckles--anything made from metal. I
am opposed to any recycling of radioactive materials, including metal, into
any consumer products. All radiation and radioactivity should be isolated
from the environment forever. EPA must set a zero tolerance standard for
radioactivity in consumer products.
Furthermore, this comment period was not publicized and the timing did not
consider the general public's ability to comment during the busiest holiday
season of year.
Regulations should not be used to legitimize recycling of these materials
into consumer goods. The amount of radiation that Americans are exposed to
today is continually increasing as a result of nuclear power generation,
nuclear weapons production and testing, and other events. Now the US
government wants to increase our exposure further by allowing companies to
profit from recycling these materials? The US government is supposed to
protect its citizens from harm, not secretly increase our exposure to these
dangerous materials.
Americans have repeatedly expressed our outrage at these proposals. Not so
long ago, Congress had to step in and force the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission and the Department of Energy to back off from their "below
regulatory concern" activities. I hope we don't have to go down that route
again.
Please protect our children from radioactive products. Don't allow
radioactive materials to be "recycled" into consumer products.
Sincerely,
Your Name
You can also send it to:general.comments@epamail.epa.gov,(Carol
Browner)BROWNER.CAROL@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV
Jessica Vallette
Organizer
Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy Project
215 PA Ave., SE
Washington, DC 20003
phone: 202-546-4996 ext. 323 fax: 202-547-7392
Visit our web page: http://www.citizen.org/cmep
***************************************************************
EAGLE
Environmental Assoc. for Great Lakes Education
394 Lake Ave. South, #308
Duluth, MN 55802
(218) 726-1828
email: lakes@cp.duluth.mn.us
Debbie Ortman and Jan Conley
Check out our new web sites:
EAGLE: http://www.cp.duluth.mn.us/~lakes/eagle.html
Great Lakes Women's Leadership Network Project:
http://www.cp.duluth.mn.us/~lakes/
Green Thumb Project (pesticide-free lawns):
http://www.cp.duluth.mn.us/~lakes/grthumb.html