[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
GLTF FYI - Appropriations for Army Corps of Engineers
- Subject: GLTF FYI - Appropriations for Army Corps of Engineers
- From: Rochelle_Sturtevant@glenn.senate.gov (Rochelle Sturtevant)
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 13:17:23 -0400
- List-Name: GLIN-Announce
GLIN folks!
The Energy and Water Development Conference Report is now available
(H. Rept 105-749).
The following is a summary of the programs tracked by the Great Lakes
Task Force:
The Conference report reiterated the House and Senate provision of
$500,000 for Sediment Transport Models and Sediment Management
Planning and $500,000 for improvement of the Soo lock system at Sault
Ste. Marie. While not explicit in the conference report, it is
expected that $300,000 was provided for Interagency and International
Support as indicated in both the House and Senate report.
The Conference report explicitly provided only $750,000 for zebra
mussel research (both House and Senate Reports had indicated funding
would be at the Administration request of $1.5 million).
The Conference Report provided the House mark of $500,000 for the
Duluth Alternative Technology Project (Senate $0).
The Conference report provided the House mark of $1,037,000 for the
Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting (Senate $537,000).
The Conference report provided the House mark of $500,000 for Remedial
Action Planning Assistance (Senate $0). Planning Assistance to States
(Section 221) was funded at $6.3 million splitting the difference
between the House ($5.3 million) and Senate ($7.5 million) marks.
The Conference report provided $300,000 for the dispersal barrier at
the Chicago Shipping and Sanitary Canal, splitting the difference
between the House ($500,000) and Senate ($0) marks.
The Conference Report provided $5 million for Dredging Operations
Environmental Research. The report does not contradict the House
report language directing the Corps to make contaminated sediments
research a priority within this account. The conference report also
did not contradict House Report language directing the Corps to
complete its study of existing Confined Disposal Facilities and report
to Congress.
The Conference provided $350,000 for beneficial use of dredged
materials (Section 204), splitting the difference between the House
mark of $500,000 and the Senate Mark of $200,000.
Restoration of Environmental Quality (Section 1135). The Conference
provided $11 million for this account (House mark $4.1 million, Senate
mark $15 million, Administration request $5.3 million). Language
added by the Senate (floor amendment offered by Senator Levin)
indicating that $500,000 of these funds could be used for Sediment
Remediation Technology Demonstration was removed in conference.
Conference report language indicates that preference should be given
to the projects mentioned in the House and Senate reports, which total
$10,268,000. Competition for the remaining discretionary funds is
likely to be intense.
Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 206). The Conference provided
$11.2 million for this account (House mark $11.2 million, Senate mark
$6 million, Administration request $2 million). Language added by the
Senate (floor amendment offered by Senator Levin) indicating that
$200,000 of these funds could be used for construction of sea lamprey
barriers in the Great Lakes was removed in conference. Conference
report language indicates that preference should be given to the
projects mentioned in the House and Senate reports, which total
$11,790,000.
$3 million was provided for aquatic nuisance plant control research,
splitting the difference between the House ($2.5 million) and Senate
($4 million) marks. While not reiterated in conference, Senate report
language indicating that actual control efforts should take priority
within this account were not contradicted.
For more information, contact:
Rochelle Sturtevant
Coordinator, Senate Great Lakes Task Force
202-224-4229
Rochelle_Sturtevant@glenn.senate.gov
or check out the NE-MW homepage at www.nemw.org