[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
GLIN==> National attack on Clean Air Act
- Subject: GLIN==> National attack on Clean Air Act
- From: "Alex J. Sagady & Associates" <ajs@sagady.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:54:34 -0500
- Delivered-To: glin-announce-archive@glc.org
- Delivered-To: glin-announce@great-lakes.net
- List-Name: GLIN-Announce
This publication of a final rule by the Bush Administration,
certain to be challenged in court by several parties [will Michigan under
Jennifer Granholm be among them?] will dramatically weaken clean air
protections
in Michigan and elsewhere,.....and not just for elderly power plants, but
all industrial plants...
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: John Walke or Elliott Negin at 292-298-6868
Bush Weakening of Clean Air Act Threatens Public Health, Says NRDC
Group Warns Decision the Beginning of an All-Out Assault on Environment
WASHINGTON (November 22, 2002) – Today’s Bush administration decision to
weaken a key Clean Air Act provision will dramatically increase air
pollution and threaten the health of millions of Americans, according to
NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council). The group also warned that
today’s decision is a sign of things to come. It predicted that the
administration, emboldened by the recent election results, will intensify
its campaign to dismantle longstanding environmental safeguards across the
board.
“The Bush administration decided to allow corporate polluters to spew even
more toxic chemicals into our air, regardless of the fact that it will harm
millions of Americans,” said John Walke, director of NRDC’s Clean Air
Program. “More than 30,000 Americans die every year from power plant air
pollution alone, and crippling the standards will only make things worse.”
NRDC plans to take legal action against the rule change.
The provision in question, called “New Source Review” (NSR), requires
facilities to install modern pollution controls when they upgrade or modify
their equipment and significantly increase their emissions. NSR requires
more than 17,000 of the country’s largest polluting facilities to clean up
increased emissions from facility changes. These facilities include oil
refineries, chemical plants, power plants, incinerators, iron and steel
foundries, paper mills, cement plants, and a broad array of manufacturing
facilities.
Besides gutting the NSR provision with final rule changes (see below), the
administration today also proposed loopholes that essentially would
eliminate cleanup requirements for existing facilities. Specifically, the
Environmental Protection Agency has recommended two unlawful exemptions
that would allow companies to modify their plants in any way, call it
“routine maintenance,” and avoid installing pollution controls when they
significantly increase emissions. Former EPA enforcement officials have
sharply criticized these proposals because they believe they will undermine
pending enforcement cases against coal-fired power plants.
“Under this administration, the cop is not only off the beat, the EPA is
proposing to legalize harmful pollution that today is illegal,” said Walke.
Rumors of these proposed exemptions already have prompted defendants in
pending power plant enforcement cases to argue that the government is
reversing course on its legal positions, he said. NRDC believes that
today’s proposal will further undercut enforcement cases and discourage
settlements.
NRDC sees today’s decision as just the beginning of a two-year
administration campaign. “Sadly, there is every reason to believe that this
is just the leading edge of an assault on fundamental protections for our
air, water and public health by the Bush administration,” said Gregory
-more-
Wetstone, NRDC’s director of advocacy. “Emboldened by the election, and
unrestrained by serious congressional oversight, the Bush administration is
escalating its effort to undermine our landmark environmental laws.”
Although NRDC did not have the final rule at this writing, a draft version
obtained by NRDC shows that the administration will weaken NSR in a number
of fundamental ways, including:
· Smoke and Mirrors: Under the NSR provision, changes at industrial
facilities resulting in significant pollution increases (e.g., 40 tons per
year) triggered cleanup obligations. To determine whether pollution
increases, a company must compare its pollution before the change, known as
its pollution “baseline,” with pollution levels after the change. The
administration’s rule change will allow a facility to pick a fictional
pollution baseline that is worse than its actual pollution levels,
essentially allowing the facility to pollute more and pretend it is not.
· The Dirty Unit Loophole: The Environmental Protection Agency is
creating a loophole in NSR requirements called the “clean unit” exemption.
Far from being clean, the sole purpose of the exemption is to allow
significant increases in air pollution to avoid cleanup and installing
state-of-the-art pollution controls that were required under NSR rules.
· No PAL of Mine: EPA is adopting a plant-wide applicability limit
(PAL) concept that purports to be a 10-year “cap” on pollution covering an
entire facility. It will allow facilities to lock in excessive pollution
levels – without having to reduce those levels – and avoid cleanup under
NSR for 10 years and beyond. EPA will not mandate pollution control
requirements for new or existing polluting equipment under a PAL. A PAL
will last 10 years, allowing pollution decreases that occurred nine years
ago to purportedly “offset” actual and significant pollution increases
today, thereby avoiding cleanup today.
Today, EPA also proposed a “routine maintenance” loophole in NSR cleanup
standards. Specifically, the agency proposed two versions of a loophole
that would allow facilities to increase pollution from hundreds to tens of
thousands of tons. The first version would allow companies to replace as
much as 15 percent of the total capital cost of their facilities each year,
increase pollution as much as they wanted, and avoid cleanup. The second
would allow companies to replace any piece of equipment of any size with
the same or similar new equipment, increase pollution as much as they
wanted, and avoid cleanup.
“These two exemptions have no basis under the Clean Air Act and essentailly
would eliminate NSR cleanup standards,” said Walke. “And it should be
stressed that these new loopholes would supplement – not replace – existing
NSR exemptions. In other words, EPA is not clarifying the existing ‘routine
maintenance’ exemption; it’s merely adding new ones that kill the standards.”
The Natural Resources Defense Council is a national, non-profit
organization of scientists, lawyers and environmental specialists dedicated
to protecting public health and the environment. Founded in 1970, NRDC has
more than 500,000 members nationwide, served from offices in New York,
Washington, Los Angeles and San Francisco. More information is available at
NRDC’s Web site, .
###
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alex J. Sagady & Associates http://my.voyager.net/~ajs/sagady.pdf
Environmental Enforcement, Technical Review, Public Policy and
Communications on Air, Water and Waste/Community Environmental Protection
PO Box 39, East Lansing, MI 48826-0039
(517) 332-6971; (517) 332-8987 (fax); ajs@sagady.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote of the Week:
"Osama bin Laden is still alive and plotting more attacks while we play
bureaucratic shuffleboard." Sen. Robert C. Bird (during debate on
homeland security bill).
========================================
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
glin-announce is hosted by the Great Lakes Information Network (GLIN):
http://www.great-lakes.net
To subscribe: http://www.glin.net/forms/glin-announce_form.html
To post a message: http://www.glin.net/forms/glin-announce_post.html
To search the archive: http://www.glin.net/lists/glin-announce/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *