[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
GLIN==> Congress urged to act on restoration needs
- Subject: GLIN==> Congress urged to act on restoration needs
- From: Kirk Haverkamp <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:24:38 -0400
- Delivered-To: email@example.com
- Delivered-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- List-Name: GLIN-Announce
- Organization: Great Lakes Commission
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
Contact: Dr. Michael J. Donahue, 734-971-9135, email@example.com
The following correspondence, recently sent by the Great Lakes Commission
to members of the Great Lakes Congressional Delegation, responded to the
recent U.S. General Accounting Office report and associated developments.
Please visit the Commission web site at www.glc.org for updates on other
Commission advocacy efforts.
June 10, 2003
Great Lakes Congressional Delegation
Dear Senator/Representative --------
The Great Lakes Commission has long been a vocal advocate for a well-coordinated
and scientifically sound approach to restoration and protection in the Great
Lakes-St. Lawrence ecosystem. We therefore applaud the recent release of
the U.S. General Accounting Office report (An Overall Strategy and Indicators
for Measuring Progress Are Needed to Better Achieve Restoration Goals)
and urge careful consideration of its recommendations.
Founded in U.S. state and federal law, the Great Lakes Commission is mandated
to promote informed public policy through communications, policy research
and development, and advocacy. The GAO report findings re-affirm concerns
our membership has expressed in recent years through formal resolutions and
other policy positions. Simply stated, we need an overarching plan –
with a consensus-based vision, goals, objectives and strategic actions –
by which the restoration and protection efforts of governmental agencies
at all levels are coordinated. Further, we need a science-based decision
support system to ensure that the priorities are established and addressed
on the basis of best available information.
We believe that this unmet need can, and should, be promptly addressed through
three specific actions that you can take as a member of the Great Lakes Congressional
1) Enact U.S. federal legislation that authorizes and funds development
of a Great Lakes Restoration Plan. Such legislation should provide for
a state/federal partnership and consultation with relevant Canadian interests.
It should ensure leadership by the Council of Great Lakes Governors, and
be guided by the ongoing work of the Council’s Restoration Priorities Task
Force. It should also provide for input from all sectors of the Great Lakes-St.
Lawrence community. Such legislation is a priority of the Great Lakes Commission,
and is embodied in its 2003 statement titled The Great Lakes Program to
Ensure Environmental and Economic Prosperity.
2) Strengthen science-based decisionmaking by enacting S. 1116, the
Great Lakes Water Quality Monitoring Implementation Act. Recently introduced
in response to GAO report recommendations, this legislation can help establish
the scientific foundation for restoration plan implementation. It’s focus
on a consistent and coordinated binational approach is applauded by our membership,
which unanimously adopted a resolution last month calling for data exchange
partnerships and standardization of decision support tools.
3) Urge the U.S. and Canadian federal governments to undertake a comprehensive
review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement and revise, if needed,
to reflect current restoration priorities. The GAO report clearly regards
the Agreement as a focal point for binational restoration efforts, and also
"that a binational review in 1999 'found that certain provisions were
out of date and concluded that certain changes should be considered . . .'
Indeed, the current Agreement is now 16 years old and is rapidly becoming
a memorial to the past rather than a guidepost for the future. An updated
Agreement is fundamental to the success of any prospective restoration plan.
The Great Lakes Commission has long been on record in support of Agreement
review, and reiterates this need as an important complement to the two preceding
I appreciate your consideration and urge you, in your Great Lakes leadership
role, to embrace and advance these recommendations. The member states of
the Great Lakes Commission stand ready to assist. Please contact Dr. Michael
J. Donahue, President/CEO at 734-971-9135 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Samuel W. Speck
The Great Lakes Commission, chaired by Samuel W. Speck (Ohio), is a nonpartisan,
binational compact agency created by state and U.S. federal law and dedicated
to promoting a strong economy, healthy environment and high quality of life
for the Great LakesSt. Lawrence region and its residents. The Commission
consists of state legislators, agency officials and governors’ appointees
from its eight member states. Associate membership for Ontario and Québec
was established through the signing of a “Declaration of Partnership.” The
Commission maintains a formal Observer program involving U.S. and Canadian
federal agencies, tribal authorities, binational agencies and other regional
interests. The Commission offices are located in Ann Arbor, Michigan.