[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
GLIN==> News Release: Ballast Water Law Reviewed
- Subject: GLIN==> News Release: Ballast Water Law Reviewed
- From: "Marie E. Zhuikov" <mzhuikov@d.umn.edu>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:24:58 -0600
- Delivered-to: glin-announce-archive@glc.org
- Delivered-to: glin-announce@great-lakes.net
- List-name: GLIN-Announce
MN SEA GRANT
NEWS RELEASE
12/20/06
Contact: Marie Zhuikov, (218) 726-7677, mzhuikov@umn.edu
Michigan Ballast Water Law Takes Maiden Voyage -- Has Legal
Implications for Other States
For the first time, a state plans to regulate ballast water beyond
national standards. On January 1, Michigan Senate Bill 332 goes into
effect. Although the new law has raised legal questions about a state's
right to regulate international commerce and provoked criticism from
the shipping industry, it is lauded by some as an important step
towards curbing the movement of aquatic invasive species.
"Commerce on navigable waters is typically the domain of the federal
government, not state government," said Dale Bergeron, Minnesota Sea
Grant?s maritime transportation extension educator. "I suspect that the
new ballast water law, if it isn't defeated in a legal challenge, could
deter shipping traffic from Michigan's ports."
The Michigan bill mandates that all ships with ballast tanks that have
floated on salt water and then expect to use Michigan ports must either
keep their ballast onboard or use a state-approved method to treat the
aquatic life in outgoing water. To show their compliance, each vessel
must carry a $150 annual ballast permit from the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality.
"Similar ballast laws are being considered in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and
Indiana," said Bergeron. "What happens with the Michigan law will
likely impact what these states attempt."
Bergeron consulted with staff at the National Sea Grant Law Center in
Mississippi to evaluate the rights of a state regulating shipping. They
concluded that although states have a right to protect their waters, an
international ballast water treaty, four Congressional bills, and
several clauses in the U.S. Constitution could preempt Michigan's
ballast water law. Since many fleet operators would need to install new
equipment, retrofit existing infrastructure, and train personnel to
comply, legal challenges may cite that Bill 332 damages international
commerce.
The U.S. and Canadian Coast Guards shoulder the burden of keeping
aquatic invasive species out of the Great Lakes. They require
ocean-going ships carrying ballast water to either exchange the water
offshore, or keep it onboard. Of the roughly 500 ocean-going vessels
entering the Great Lakes in a year, about 90 percent are exempt from
these regulations because they are cargo-laden and report no ballast
onboard (NOBOB). NOBOB vessels must submit ballast water reporting
forms and are encouraged to flush their ballast tanks mid-ocean (swish
and spit) but they may still carry residual water or sediments into the
Great Lakes.
By ratifying Bill 332 two years ago, Michigan legislators indicated
dissatisfaction with the efficacy of mid-ocean ballast flushing and
endorsed four ballast treatment systems considered experimental by many
experts.
Among Michigan ports, Detroit and Menominee could be most affected by
the new law since they handle the majority of saltwater ships in the
state. However, the number of ships is very small since most of the
salties on the Great Lakes are bound for Canadian ports and terminals
in other states. To date, no shipping companies have applied for a
Ballast Water Control General Permit from Michigan -- although there is
still time, since the ocean-going shipping season doesn't begin until
late March.
A virus responsible for massive fish die-offs in the Lower Great Lakes
and the St. Lawrence Seaway has fueled additional ballast water
discussions across the Great Lakes. In November, Michigan requested
that the federal government order an emergency ban on freighters
filling their ballast tanks in waters where the VHS virus has been
found. Shipping industry representatives fear that such a ballast ban
would cripple shipping within the Great Lakes.
A copy of the National Sea Grant Law Center's ballast water white paper
is available online: http://seagrant.umn.edu/downloads/ballast.pdf.
###
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
glin-announce is hosted by the Great Lakes Information Network (GLIN):
http://www.great-lakes.net
To subscribe: http://www.glin.net/forms/glin-announce_form.html
To post a message: http://www.glin.net/forms/glin-announce_post.html
To search the archive: http://www.glin.net/lists/glin-announce/
All views and opinions presented above are solely those of the author or
attributed source and do not necessarily reflect those of GLIN or its
management.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *