[Date Prev][Date Next][Date Index]
GLIN==> OMB Bulletin on Risk Assessment
- Subject: GLIN==> OMB Bulletin on Risk Assessment
- From: "Alex J. Sagady & Associates" <ajs@sagady.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:01:43 -0500
- Delivered-to: glin-announce-archive@glc.org
- Delivered-to: glin-announce@great-lakes.net
- List-name: GLIN-Announce
For Immediate
Release
Contact: Alisha Prather, 202.225.6375
January 11,
2007
Chairmen Agree - OMB Bulletin "Fundamentally Flawed"
(Washington, DC) Last May, House Chairmen Bart Gordon (D-TN,
Science & Technology), John D. Dingell (D-MI, Energy &
Commerce), Henry A. Waxman (D-CA, Oversight & Government
Reform), and James Oberstar (D-MN, Transportation &
Infrastructure)
wrote
to the National Academy of Sciences when they initiated their review
of the White House Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Proposed Risk
Assessment Bulletin.
The four Chairmen urged the NAS to either expand the scope of their
review to address policy and funding issues in addition to the scientific
issues raised by the Bulletin - or to clearly define the scope of their
review.
On the basis of their scientific review, the NAS committee concluded
unanimously today that the OMB Bulletin is
"fundamentally flawed" and the committee recommended that
OMB withdraw the Bulletin.
Chairmen offered comment today on the NAS report issued by the
National Research Council:
"OMB overstepped its authority and expertise by issuing this
Bulletin. Congress has repeatedly rejected one-size-fits all
approaches to developing scientific and technical information and now it
has been rejected by the experts at NAS as well. OMB should
withdraw this Bulletin promptly and abandon its attempts to micromanage
agencies' work," said Chairman Gordon.
"OMB should follow NAS's recommendation and abandon its costly
requirement for superfluous analysis that ignores the specific statutory
directives Congress gave the agencies," said Chairman
Dingell.
"This White House initiative jeopardizes the agencies' ability to
develop science-based policies that protect human health and the
environment. The National Academy report is a stringent rebuke, and
I urge the Bush Administration to withdraw this fundamentally flawed
proposal," said Chairman Waxman.
Also commenting on the matter, Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on
Environment and Hazardous Materials Chairman Albert Wynn (D-MD)
said, "I am deeply troubled by the affect that OMB's proposed risk
assessment analysis would have on our most vulnerable and disadvantaged
constituents. I agree with the NAS's assessment that the
OMB's proposed changes to risk assessment analysis would enable agencies
like the Environmental Protection Agency to ignore the needs of certain
segments of the population such as infants, children, the elderly, low
income and minority communities. These are the communities most
affected by hazardous waste and disposal issues and these are the
communities that need the safeguards of environmental laws the
most. We must ensure that they receive all the protection they are
entitled to under the law."
==========================================
Alex J. Sagady & Associates
http://www.sagady.com
Environmental Enforcement, Permit/Technical Review, Public Policy,
Expert Witness Review and Litigation Investigation on Air, Water and
Waste/Community Environmental and Resource Protection
Prospectus at:
http://www.sagady.com/sagady.pdf
657 Spartan Ave, East Lansing, MI 48823
(517) 332-6971; (517) 332-8987 (fax); ajs@sagady.com
==========================================