[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Size of Market for P2 Services?

Dale makes many good points and is very tactful in pointing out the
experience base that seems to be out there.  If you are building jet engines
or semiconductors and the consult arrives on site and must first learn what
your factory is about and how it works, then you may be in trouble.  You
should hope that at least in this scenario, you are using one of those tax
supported and free consultants.  

Michael R. James 
James Environmental Management, Inc.
2007 North Mays   Ste. 101
Round Rock, Texas   78664
512-244-0853 (fax)

At 07:03 AM 2/3/98 -0500, you wrote:
>I would disagree about the comments that manufacturers are not will to 
>pay for P2 services.  Many, particularly the large and "larger" middle 
>sized companies have active P2 programs with full time people who are 
>either fully dedicated to P2 or at least P2 is a significant 
>responsibility for them.  This may not be "paying for these services" 
>in the sense of consultants the cost of manpower is significant.  In 
>addition, many (most?) of these people are as or more qualified to 
>conduct P2 surveys and projects within their industry than the 
>consultants they can hire.
>Don't get me wrong; there are many qualified P2 consultants available. 
> However, there are many consultants who also know that this is a 
>viable market and want part of it.  They are willing to learn about P2 
>and get experience but most companies are not willing to pay 
>consultants as they are learning.
>I think there is a significant market.  I think there is also a very 
>low true experience level in industry, consulting, and in agency 
>programs.  Look as some of the questions posed in this list server. 
> They are good questions but they are VERY basic questions.  By 
>continued interaction the knowledge and experience will grow.  I do 
>think that a phrase different than Pollution Prevention which is more 
>descriptive of not only the environmental point (Don't create waste) 
>and the business emphasis (bottom line improvement "at all cost") 
>would aid our cause and increase general interest in P2.  Maybe Profit 
>Improvement thru Reduced Pollution or "PIRP".  Sorry, what we don't 
>need is another acronym.  What we need is true concern for the 
>environment and for natural resource conservation.
>Thanks to those who made it through this rambling.  Sometimes you just 
>have to speak your mind(?).
>Dale Francke
>Pratt & Whitney,  M/S 717-03
>P.O. Box 109600
>W. Palm Beach, FL  33410-9600
>e-mail :  frncked@pwfl.com
>(561) 796-3733    FAX  (561) 796-2787
>From: 	wjw5@psu.edu[SMTP:wjw5@psu.edu]
>Sent: 	Monday, February 02, 1998 1:56 PM
>To: 	sjhillenbrand@tva.gov
>Cc: 	p2tech@great-lakes.net
>Subject: 	Re: Size of Market for P2 Services?
>Virtually every manufacturer, though the majority would not (yet) be
>willing to pay for these services.
>>Does anyone have information on the size of the potential market for
>>Pollution Prevention services?
>>Industrial Waste Reduction Engineer
>>Synterprise Group, Division of Tennessee Valley Authority
>>(423) 632-8489; (423) 632-3616 (fax)
>>TVA IWR HomePage  http://www.tva.gov/orgs/iwr/iwrhome.htm
>Warren J. Weaver
>227 W. Market St.
>York, PA 17401
>fax 717-854-0087
>ph 717-848-6669
>PENNTAP website:
>           www.penntap.psu.edu
>Attachment Converted: D:\EUDORA\RESizeof
Michael R. James
James Environmental Management, Inc.
2007 N. Mays  Suite 101
Round Rock, TX  78664
512-244-0853 fax