[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fees & p2 --- reply

Dear Kathy and P2'ers:

The Department of Energy faced the same issue described in your note and in 
January 1995 published a study that estimated all costs for waste disposal, 
including labor, handling, packaging, transportation, etc. While the study 
was developed for DOE operations, it does give an excellent overview of all 
the costs associated with waste management. The study includes not only solid 
and hazardous wastes, but also more "exotic" wastes (various radioactive, 
mixed, etc) not found in typical commercial or industrial operations.

The study has  been cleared for public release and is available from Chris 
Ischay at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. Call 

Ask for: INEL-94/0205, "Avoidable Waste Management Costs," January 1995.

Mark Boylan
General Manager
22 Executive Park Court
Germantown  MD  20874
(f) 301/540-0088


Subj:    fees & p2
Date:   2/7/2000 8:52:38 PM Eastern Standard Time
From:   KBarwick@dtsc.ca.gov (Kathy Barwick)
Sender: owner-p2tech@great-lakes.net
Reply-to:   KBarwick@dtsc.ca.gov (Kathy Barwick)
To: nppr@great-lakes.net, p2tech@great-lakes.net

I am currently working on an overview of financial and economic incentives 
for pollution prevention.  There's plenty of information in the archives and 
the web (thanks everyone!) but I haven't found any info about the 
relationship between hazardous waste disposal fees and waste generation.

Us p2 folks frequently cite "high disposal costs" (and other mgmt costs) as 
one of the reasons why businesses should consider implementing more p2.  Of 
course, I realize that poor accounting practices would obscure this 
information for facility managers, but even if they could accurately assess 
these costs, would they provide sufficient incentives for reduction?

Does anyone know of studies that show a relationship between disposal fees 
and the quantity of waste generated?

Similarly, does anyone know of a state (or other jurisdiction) that crafts 
fees consciously as an incentive to reduce waste (as opposed to, for example, 
crafting fees that will cover regulatory costs).  In other words, using the 
disposal fee as an incentive to reduce waste. . . 

Thanks for any and all responses!