[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: P2 and National Security
The minimum resource requirements can also mean fewer
metals, oil, etc. that are withdrawn from other countries =
fewer social disruptions that occur from any extractive
processes and environmental degradation.
--- Burton Hamner <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hello all. I am doing some thinking about Pollution
> Prevention and national security at request of a
> colleague and also for a workshop in March. Is there an
> obvious connection? Or some more subtle ones? Here are
> some of my thoughts:
> - Toxics reduction: P2 can mean fewer toxic chemicals
> around for people to make trouble with.
> - Minimum requirements for resources: P2 can reduce the
> amount of water and energy that people need to get by, so
> they are less vulnerable perhaps in event of disruption
> of supply. Reducing use also makes distributed
> generation of power and clean water more feasible so
> systems have fewer vulnerable points.
> - Carbohydrate chemistry and chemical substitutions and
> reduction can reduce the need for imported oil (tho this
> is hardly likely to make any difference).
> Does anyone have other ideas to share? It may be that
> this is all just reaching a little too far for relevance
> to national security. But that's what listservs are for
> - reaching way far!
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!