[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Just barely off topic: Can Nuclear Energy ever be "sustainable?"
Just barely off topic: Can Nuclear Energy ever be "sustainable?"Using the
"ideal" definition, just like everything else, the answer is no.
Just the fact the atoms are undergoing fission are destroyed, means
raw material is lost. So you are left with stating a definition and
comparing nuclear power to that definition.
Couple of things to consider:
1. Under current systems, there is waste that can not be reused or recycled,
ie Yuca Flats.
2. There is water and air pollution. Compared to coal, there is no contest,
but it is there.
3. There are energy considerations to prepping the cores, but if the energy
nuclear power, that goes away.
4. Do you count the energy lost during delivery of the electricity as a bad
thing knowing that
happens with all sources that come in bulk?
The biggest thing to answer, is it sustainable compared to the alternatives?
probably the closest to sustainable (considering bulk solar is not here
Henry Boyter, Jr., PhD
Director of Research
Institute of Textile Technology
NCSU College of Textiles
2401 Research Drive
Raleigh, NC 27695-8301
----- Original Message -----
From: Butner, R Scott
To: P2 Tech list serve
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 4:49 PM
Subject: Just barely off topic: Can Nuclear Energy ever be "sustainable?"
Fellow P2TECH-ies --
Well, can it?
And if the answer is "yes" -- what would it take to make it so?
These are not idle musings on the part of a scruffy, distractable,
overweight nerd, either.
Nope. Not idle in the least.
(The rest is pretty much spot on, of course.)
I ask these questions because I've been approached about making a
presentation on this topic at a conference which is coming up later this
fall, and wish to gather some informed perspectives on the subject. As I
often do when faced with a question that's over my head, technically, I've
come to P2TECH in hopes of finding some bits of wisdom. And maybe some
viewpoints that challenge my own.
I recognize this is an open-ended question -- I think by now we all have a
grasp of what the notion of sustainability means, but am not sure I've seen
anything really robust in terms of quantifiable definitions.
Yes, I'm aware of any number of sustainability metrics and indicators that
have been used (and in fact plan to use them prominently in my talk).
But most of these metrics allow for more wiggle room than my most comfy blue
jeans, now that I've lost 22 lbs.
(had to sneak that in there, somewhere!)
So consider it an invitation to open-ended answers, as well.
If you have an opinion regarding either question: whether nuclear power CAN
be sustainable, or what it would take to MAKE it sustainable -- I'm eager to
hear it. If I end up using your ideas in my talk, I'll be sure to provide
The conference is in mid-November, but I'd be especially interested in
comments I receive early enough to incorporate into a broader framework --
say, Oct 1.
I'll be sure to share the presentation with any who wish to see it, once
it's been prepared.
Thanks in advance,
Senior Research Scientist, Knowledge Transformation & Integration Group
Pacific NW National Laboratory
PO Box 999
Richland, WA 99352
Voice: (509)-372-4946/Fax: (509) 375-2443
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
P2TECH is hosted by the Great Lakes Information Network:
To unsubscribe from this list: send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
with the command 'unsubscribe p2tech' in the body of your message. No
quotes or subject line are required.
About : http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/p2tech/p2tech.info.
A map of P2TECH subscribers can be viewed at http://www.frappr.com/p2tech.
This list is managed by the Great Lakes Regional Pollution
Prevention Roundtable (http://www.glrppr.org), part of the
P2Rx national network of regional P2 information centers