[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Just catching up.
Someone in Scio definitely should try to put a parks millage on the ballot.
We did it here in Pittsfield, and it passed overwhelmingly a few years ago.
I think, though, that Scio doesn't have an elected Parks Board as we do in
Pitts. You might want that. We also have a whole Parks and REc Dept. with
Soccer and Natural areas: Have both. Natural area preservation is critical
to our environmental health, though, so should not be ignored. Here in
Pitts, we had a terrific opportunity to buy 150 acres of wonderful land that
could have provided both, but our very curious board refused to buy it,
saying that at $6000 per acre it was too expensive (Not one piece of land
could be bought for less in Pitts). (Unfortunately, tho the citizens pay for
the millage, we have no say in how it is spent). That provided a wonderful
opportunity for the Newmarket developer, no fool, to snap it up with an
opption (I think if we can kill that off, it might be available again.
That's where the citizens want Heritage Park, if only we can evict the pro
development clique now in power on our board.) To show you how stupid
Woolley, Skrobola, Shelton, and Bocklage were, they just agreed to pay over
twenty thousand an acre for another parcel, with our parks millage money. So
a millage is a good idea, but try to elect people who are not completely in
the developer's pockets to go with it. We've failed in that regard here in
Pitts.(We have a super Parks Commission; unfortunately, the actual millage
money is controlled by the board, a majority of whom want insane levels of
Let's look into no pesticide/no fertilizer options for soccer fields.
Vivienne makes a good point about the tree-lessness, which is why we need
both natural and active areas.
By the way, Vivienne, our little consumer Ag. group with Mike Score has some
test plots at Gallup park testing ground up soy beans as a natural
alternative to commercial fertilizer. Public input is sought; I'll get a
better description of the location and post it.
MAKE DEVELOPERS provide soccer fields for the populations they bring and for
the community at large. Right now, they only "preserve" land they can't
build on. These little scraps of habitat are nice, but do little for
wildlife preservation and less for soccer enthusiasts.
I do believe soccer fields are in the works for the AA soccer association on
the corner of Ellsworth and Lohr.
Craig - that sucks in Green Oak. My mom read me the same article over the
phone. Really upsetting. I hope we can get a referendum on Newmarket, and
the two other monster PUDs being proposed on Mich. Ave., and that the board
can't circumvent our rights. I'll call Herb in Green Oak to get the lowdown
on that consent judgement. I hope there's more to that story that I'm
missing; otherwise, it sounds like Woolley and crew have a wonderful
opportunity to stuff Newmarket down our throats. I wonder why LAGO couldn't
get standing on that case, as co-defendents? Nightmare city.
Talk to you soon - Tina
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
smartgrowth-washtenaw: Internet List and Forum for issues relating to
sprawl, smart growth, and preservation of the quality of life in Washtenaw
Postings to: email@example.com For info, send
email to firstname.lastname@example.org with a one-line message body of "info