[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SG-W:/ Fwd: [migreens] How to Combat Derelict Urban Housing
- Subject: SG-W:/ Fwd: [migreens] How to Combat Derelict Urban Housing
- From: Steve Bean <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 23:50:46 -0500
- Delivered-To: email@example.com
- Delivered-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
This letter may not apply to much of Washtenaw County, but I'm hoping
that the thinking it demonstrates might spark some ideas of similarly
innovative approaches to sticky issues like farmland preservation or
affordable housing. Give it a read and put on your thinking caps.
---------------- Begin Forwarded Message ----------------
Date: 03/10 3:39 PM
Received: 03/11 8:17 AM
From: John Gear, email@example.com
I just sent this into the Lansing State Journal in response to the
in today's paper about the city's struggle to deal with derelict
houses. (Which seems likely to take us in the direction of Detroit's
areas of disinvestment rather than towards any kind of renewal.)
Christine MacDonald's good article on Lansing's many derelict houses
10, "Fix it or flatten it") suggests how ineffective our current
to preserving and maintaining Lansing's housing stock is. Our top-down,
red-tape intensive "system" for dealing with derelict houses is really
"Don't spend an ounce on prevention, wait until it requires pounds to
if it's still curable at all." And the "cure" -- destroying housing --
the urban equivalent of blood-letting, as harmful as the disease.
Decaying housing, declining population, budget shortfalls and
schools are social cancers. Each one spreads through the body politic
triggers the others. Do physicians treating cancer wait for tumors to
spread throughout the body to respond? That's how we treat decaying
housing. Rather than acting promptly we wait until repairs cost half of
the house's value and it's in terminal condition.
What we must do is shift from a reactive and bureaucratically-managed
system (letting housing stock decay before instituting expensive and
painfully slow city intervention) to a proactive system that creates
incentives for arresting further decay. We must ensure that owners
restore substandard houses promptly or sell them to someone who will.
That means reversing the payoffs (lower taxes) that reward owners for
letting rentals decay. Basically, we need to make it more profitable to
keep a house in productive use than to let it become or remain derelict.
How? Charge rental property owners an escalating monthly fee whenever
rental unit not under active restoration is vacant for more than 45
Charge $100 after 45 days, $200 after another 30 days, $400 after the
30 days, $800 after the next, and $1000 for every 30 days of vacancy
thereafter. Attach a lien to the property so that it is satisfied when
property is sold.
That way, instead of rewarding a property owner with lower property
as the value of a house declines, we create a real incentive for the
to fix the house and put it back into service or sell it to someone who
will quickly, before renovation costs skyrocket.
Put all the fees into a Housing Renewal Fund, which is then lent out at
interest to help residents buy, restore and occupy derelict houses,
eyesores into owner-occupied home. Investors could also borrow at below
market rates to fund renovations or demolish and rebuild on the same
It's an aggressive plan. But we have an aggressive cancer and our
treatment is little more than aspirin administered much too late. We
built-in incentives to allow housing to decay and a system that is both
slow to respond and irrational to boot since it destroys houses that
have been saved if we acted sooner.
Innocent neighbors suffer from blighted homes nearby -- while those
are rewarded with lower taxes as they drive property values down. This
madness. And it helps explain why Lansing suffers declining population,
higher taxes for stagnant services and struggling schools.
It's time to break that cycle. It's time to stop hoping a
process can address substandard housing effectively and to start using
market incentives to prevent problems in the first place. When we use
market to encourage decent housing and penalize the substandard stuff,
we'll get more decent housing. The only question is "What are we
= = =
John Gear is a Lansing resident and has applied to serve on the Lansing
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4.
FREE Money 2002.
Messages posted to this group are the property and responsibility of the
people who post them and do not necessarily reflect the values, opinions
or policies of the Green Party of Michigan.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
----------------- End Forwarded Message -----------------
smartgrowth-washtenaw: Internet List and Forum for issues relating to
sprawl, smart growth, and preservation of the quality of life in Washtenaw
Postings to: firstname.lastname@example.org For info, send
email to email@example.com with a one-line message body of "info