[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SG-W:/ greenbelt
- Subject: Re: SG-W:/ greenbelt
- From: BLonik13@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:51:11 EDT
- Delivered-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-To: email@example.com
In a message dated 8/11/03 12:26:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
If the citizens of Ann Arbor pass this proposal, would Ann Arbor more
likely use funds to pay for lands farther out "in the cornfields" where
there is little infrastructure or contiguous to the edge of the city
limits where there is infrastructure? Wouldn't it make more sense to
allow development contiguous to the edge of the city limits?
The program could certainly be constructed to reward properties that are some distance from the city limits rather than right up against it. There is a draft selection criteria floating around that will be the subject of debate on this topic.