The flocculated material would be treated as a special waste in Tennessee, whether it is recovered by a recycler or not. Are there exemptions in other states that you guys know of when the material has an obvious recyclable end-use? Vaughn Cassidy West TN Environmental Coordinator Office of Environmental Assistance Tn. Dept. of Environment and Conservation Office: (731) 512-1343 Cell: (731) 267-8963 Fax: (731) 661-6283 www.tdec.net >>> "Bruce Taylor" <btaylor at enviro-stewards.com> 7/28/2009 5:10 PM >>> Michelle Evaporation is likely more impact on the environment than precipitation of the metal by adjusting the pH and adding a coagulant. If the concentration is high enough, copper recovery might also be an option. Regards Bruce Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network From: "michelle gaither" Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:35:00 -0700 To: p2tech<p2tech at great-lakes.net> Subject: Waste water treatment I know this is end of pipe treatment, but if you can bear with the question - and consider the P2 angle of determining which treatment method has lower environmental impact..... I am looking for studies or case example/comparisons of treating wastewater on site using evaporation vs. another treatment method, e.g., electrocoagulation. I am trying to determine if evaporation is the best option (which is of course, a major energy consuming process). This wastewater contains copper. Thanks. Michelle Gaither 1402 Third Ave, Suite 1420 | Seattle, WA 98101 T 206.352.2050 | F 206.352.2049| www.pprc.org ( http://www.pprc.org/ ) Pacific Northwest Pollution Prevention Resource Center practical solutions for economic and environmental vitality -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/p2tech/attachments/20090729/aac51b79/attachment.html